检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张恺东 张凡巧 董博[2] 段佳霖 陈光荣[2] 王立明[2] 杨如萍[2] ZHANG Kaidong;ZHANG Fanqiao;DONG Bo;DUAN Jialin;CHEN Guangrong;WANG Liming;YANG Ruping(Yuzhong Alpine Agricultural Experiment Station,Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Gansu Greenstar Agro-tech Co.LTD.,Lanzhou 730100;Dryland Agriculture Institute,Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Lanzhou 730070;Forestry and Grassland Service Center of Tongwei County,Tongwei,Gansu 743300;College of Resources and Environmental Sciences,Gansu Agricultural University,Lanzhou 730070;Gansu Province Institute of Cold-Arid and Ecological Agriculture,Lanzhou 730070)
机构地区:[1]甘肃省农业科学院榆中高寒农业试验站/甘肃绿星农业科技有限责任公司,兰州730070 [2]甘肃省农业科学院旱地农业研究所,兰州730700 [3]通渭县林业和草原服务中心,甘肃通渭743300 [4]甘肃农业大学资源与环境学院,兰州730070 [5]甘肃省寒旱生态农业研究所,兰州730070
出 处:《中国农学通报》2024年第13期140-145,共6页Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin
基 金:国家产业技术体系“兰州大豆综合试验站建设”(CARS-04-CES25);甘肃省农业科学院重点研发项目“优质牧草大豆种质资源创制与应用”(2020GAAS11);甘肃省农业科学院重点研发项目“饲草大豆耐寒性鉴定及配套栽培技术研究”(2021GAAS16);甘肃省农业科学院重点研发项目“玉米-大豆带状复合种植模式下大豆耐荫性鉴定与应用”(2022GAAS10);甘肃省重点研发计划项目“引洮定西灌区节水生态调蓄设施及蔬菜节水补灌技术研究与示范”(20YF8NA107)。
摘 要:为提高甘肃省大豆品种的选育和应用效率,利用大豆区域试验数据,从基因型与环境的互作分析出发,对甘肃省大豆新品种的稳定性、适应性以及各试点的鉴别力进行全面评估。本研究采用AMMI模型与GGE双标图相结合的方法对甘肃省9个大豆品种在5个试验点的产量进行分析,结果表明,AMMI模型中主成分值(IPCA1、IPCA2)占总变异平方和的95%;其中‘中黄318’属于高产稳产性品种,而‘陇黄3号’和‘铁丰31’虽然产量较高,但其稳定性中等,适合在特定区域栽培。在5个试验点中,凉州分辨力最强,镇原分辨力较弱。综合运用AMMI模型和GGE双标图法,能够更准确直观地反映各品种生产力、稳定性和适应能力,以及在不同试验区域的分辨能力和代表性。To improve the selection and application efficiency of soybean varieties in Gansu Province,data from soybean regional trials were used to comprehensively assess the stability and adaptability of new soybean varieties in Gansu Province and the discrimination power of each pilot site in terms of the interaction analysis between genotype and environment.This paper used the AMMI model combined with GGE double-labeled plots to analyze the yields of nine soybean varieties in Gansu Province at five trial sites.The results showed that the principal component values(IPCA1 and IPCA2)in the AMMI model accounted for 95%of the sum of squares of the total variation;among them,‘Zhonghuang 318’was a high-yield and stable variety,while‘Longhuang 3’and‘Tiefeng 31’had higher yields but moderate stability,making them only suitable for cultivation in specific areas.Among the five trial sites,Liangzhou had the strongest discrimination power and Zhenyuan was weaker.The combined use of the AMMI model and the GGE double-labeled map method can more accurately and intuitively reflect the productivity,stability and adaptability of each variety as well as the discrimination power and representativeness of each trial site.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15