检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姜晓萍[1] 康传彬 Jiang Xiaoping;Kang Chuanbin(School of Public Administration,Sichuan University)
出 处:《社会科学研究》2024年第4期1-12,I0001,共13页Social Science Research
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目“基本公共服务均等化实现程度的评价研究”(19AZD017);中央高校基本科研业务费项目“共同富裕视域下农民工享有城市基本公共服务的可及性研究”(2023自研-公管06)。
摘 要:农民工欠薪治理不仅关乎劳有所得的公平性和可及性,更是实现全体人民共同富裕的必然要求。本文通过梳理我国农民工欠薪治理的政策演进脉络,借鉴历史制度主义构建分析框架来解释政策演进的动因与逻辑,探索二者的有机关系。在演进动因上,央地政府、农民工、用工企业等行动主体,通过共时性调适促成关系合力,关系合力的方向调整和强度凝聚牵引着欠薪治理政策不断演进。在演进逻辑上,高位推动、刚性规制、扶弱固本的路径依赖,通过历时性重构塑造内在规律,渐进延续规律和迭代升级规律的耦合使欠薪治理政策保持着稳中有进、变中有新的连贯形态。而动因和逻辑之间,存在着问题解释上的互补关系和作用路径上的互促关系。本研究不仅从政策分析层面作出了边际贡献,为理解中国场景下的民生政策演进提供了共性借鉴,而且厘清了政策优化的着力方向,有利于筑牢农民工群体融入共同富裕的政策支持。The governance of wage arrears for rural migrant workers is not only related to the fairness and accessibility of labor income,but also an inevitable requirement for achieving common prosperity for all people.By sorting out the policy evolution of the governance of wage arrears for rural migrant workers in China,the paper constructs analytical framework based on historical institutionalism,to explain the motivation and logic of policy evolution and explore the organic relationship between the two.In terms of evolution motivation,the central and local governments,rural migrant workers,employment enterprises and other action subjects have promoted the joint force of the relationship through synchronic adjustment;and the direction adjustment and intensity cohesion of the relationship joint force have led to the continuous evolution of the wage arrears governance policy.In terms of evolution logic,the path dependences including high-level promotion,rigid regulation and weak support,shaping inner regularity through diachronic reconfiguration;and the coupling of gradual continuation regularity and iterative upgrading regularity make the policy maintain consistent pattern of progress in stability and innovation in change.Between motivation and logic,there are mutualcomplementary in question explanation and mutual-facilitation in influence path.This study not only makes marginal contributions at the level of policy analysis,providing common lessons for understanding the evolution of livelihood policies in the Chinese scenario,but also clarifies the direction of policy optimization,which is conductive to building a solid policy support for the integration of rural migrant workers into common prosperity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.94.139