检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张锐 黄卫[1,2] 马涛 ZHANG Rui;HUANG Wei;MA Tao(Intelligent Transportation System(ITS)Research Center,Southeast University,Nanjing 211189,China;Key Laboratory of Transport Industry of Comprehensive Transportation Theory(Nanjing Modern Multimodal Transportation Laboratory),Nanjing 211100,China;School of Transportation,Southeast University,Nanjing 211189,China)
机构地区:[1]东南大学智能运输系统(ITS)研究中心,南京211189 [2]综合交通运输理论交通运输行业重点实验室(南京现代综合交通实验室),南京211100 [3]东南大学交通学院,南京211189
出 处:《吉林大学学报(工学版)》2024年第5期1267-1276,共10页Journal of Jilin University:Engineering and Technology Edition
基 金:国家重点研发计划项目(2020YFB1600102);国家自然科学基金项目(42074039);综合交通运输理论交通运输行业重点实验室(南京现代综合交通实验室)开放课题(MTF2023013)。
摘 要:为解决机场在进行智慧化程度评价过程中由于建设内容体量庞大,业务错综复杂,无法做到业务流科学划分并有效评价的难题,本文从面向任务对象角度以及面向功能属性的角度建立了基于对象-属性双维度的机场核心业务流评价体系,并提出了90项基础指标。在此基础上,通过优劣解距法对禄口机场的双维度指标层进行了分值计算。研究结果表明:双维度评价指标体系的建立有助于厘清机场业务流种类多元且流向繁杂的问题,方便后续机场进行智慧化程度评价;从基于任务对象维度的指标层分值可以看出,旅客流的隔离区外智慧化建设程度最高为73.76分。以功能属性维度划分的各指标中,感知类的数量/重量指标评分最高为79.68分,高出平均值21.4%;预测类的时间类指标评分最高为80.26分,高出平均值9.1%;决策类的事件类指标评分最高为76.30分,高出平均值10.2%。预测类和决策类的相关指标智慧化建设程度相对均衡,而感知类指标最低分为54.36分,最高分为79.68分,各业务智慧化建设程度相差较大。In order to solve the difficult problem of not being able to scientifically classify and effectively evaluate the business flow due to the huge construction content and complicated business during the evaluation of the degree of intelligence of airports, this study establishes the evaluation system of airport core business flow based on object-attribute double dimensions from the perspective of task object-oriented and functional attribute-oriented, and proposes 90 basic indicators. On this basis, the scores of the indicator layer of the two dimensions of Lukou Airport were calculated by the superior and inferior solution distance method. The research results show that: The establishment of the two-dimensional evaluation index system helps to clarify the problem of multiple types of business flows and complicated flows in smart airports, and facilitates the evaluation of the degree of smartness in subsequent airports;The index layer score based on the task object dimension shows that the degree of intelligent construction outside the segregated area for passenger flow is the highest at 73.76. In the evaluation of each indicator divided by functional attribute dimension, the quantity/weight indicator of the perception category has the highest rating of 79.68, 21.4% higher than the average value;the time indicator of the prediction category has the highest rating of 80.26, 9.1% higher than the average value;and the event indicator of the decision-making category has the highest rating of 76.30, 10.2%higher than the average value. The degree of intelligent construction of the related indicators in the prediction and decision-making categories is relatively balanced, while the lowest score of the perception category indicator is 54.36 and the highest score is 79.68, and there is a big difference in the degree of intelligent construction of each business.
关 键 词:航空工程 对象-属性双维度 核心业务流 智能化程度评价
分 类 号:U414[交通运输工程—道路与铁道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28