检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋宪萍 Song Xianping
机构地区:[1]北京理工大学马克思主义学院,北京100081
出 处:《当代经济研究》2024年第6期26-35,F0003,共11页Contemporary Economic Research
基 金:北京市社会科学基金规划重点项目(23KDA006)。
摘 要:在西方发达国家资本逻辑形构的现代世界贸易体系中,贸易自由与贸易保护互为镜像,它们不定期的钟摆切换,是资本主义国家主导的全球化动态螺旋上升的有机历史环节,是资本主义国家赖以实现经济增长的表征工具。马克思主义政治经济学视阈下,贸易的本质是贸易由生产决定,贸易的变化反映着生产方式本身的变化。西方发达国家贸易自由与贸易保护的共同指向是贸易垄断,美国的贸易垄断通过三种机制发生作用,分别为全球价值链分工机制、货币金融机制和收入分配机制。在西方发达国家贸易垄断的框架下,中国充当了“差异”的隐喻——一种不同于主流新自由主义议程的发展模式。根植于以“人民”为中心的中国高水平对外开放,才能破解当前世界发展困境并重塑未来世界治理秩序。In the modern world's trade system shaped by the capital logic of Western developed countries,trade freedom and trade protection are mirror images of each other,and their irregular pendulum switching is an organic historical link in the dynamic spiral of globalization led by capitalist countries and a representative tool for capitalist countries to achieve economic growth.From the perspective of Marxist political economics,the essence of trade is that trade is determined by production,and changes in trade reflect changes in the production mode itself.Trade freedom and trade protection in developed countries both lead to trade monopoly,and trade monopoly of the United States works through three mechanisms,namely the global value chain division mechanism,the monetary and financial mechanism,and the income distribution mechanism.Under the framework of trade monopoly of western developed countries,China acts as a metaphor for"difference"-a development model that is different from the mainstream neoliberal agenda.Only by China's high-level opening-up rooted in the"eople"-centered concept,can we solve the current world's development dilemma and reshape the world's governance order in the future.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.16.89.150