检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗文斌[1] 楚雪莲 唐沛 高云红 苏明明 LUO Wenbin;CHU Xuelian;TANG Pei;GAO Yunhong;SU Mingming(College of Tourism,Hunan Normal University,Changsha 410081,China;School of Ecology and Environment,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)
机构地区:[1]湖南师范大学旅游学院,长沙410081 [2]中国人民大学生态环境学院,北京100872
出 处:《Journal of Resources and Ecology》2024年第3期683-697,共15页资源与生态学报(英文版)
基 金:Hunan Provincial Department of Education(2022A0053);The National Natural Science Foundation of China(42171232)。
摘 要:农民自组织参与集体行动是优化乡村旅游治理效率、确保乡村旅游取得积极成果的关键。为了识别其潜在机制,本文选择了Institutional Analysis and Development(IAD)智能决策扩展模型。采用混合方法对湖南省长沙市郊区239户家庭进行问卷调查和20次半结构化访谈。研究结果表明:家庭生计资本、户主特征、旅游市场环境、作为旅游发展进入和退出规则的制度规则、认知改革和土地整理水平对乡村旅游农民自组织参与行为集体行动具有显著影响。其中,旅游市场环境变量下的“居住环境”和“旅游资源”的影响力度最大,土地整理变量下的“土地用途”的影响力度最小。基于研究结果,探讨了本研究的理论和实践意义,并提出了未来的研究方向。Farmers’self-organized participation in collective actions is critical to optimize governance efficiency and ensure positive outcomes of rural tourism.To identify the underlying mechanisms,the Institutional Analysis and Development(IAD)intellectual decision extension model is selected.A mixed method approach is adopted with a questionnaire survey of 239 households and 20 semi-structured interviews in the suburban of Changsha City,Hunan Province of China.Household livelihood capital,characteristics of household head,tourism market environment,institutional rules as entry and exit rules,cognitive reform and level of land consolidation are found with significant effects.Theoretical and practical implications are discussed and future research directions are put forward.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.121.244