检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:ZHAO Changxiao LI Hao ZHANG Wei DAI Jun DONG Lei
机构地区:[1]School of Safety Science and Engineering,Civil Aviation University of China,Tianjin 300300,China [2]Shenzhen Dajiang Innovation Technology Co.,Ltd.,Shenzhen 518057,China [3]Key Laboratory of Civil Aircraft Airworthiness Technology,Civil Aviation Administration of China,Tianjin 300300,China
出 处:《Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics》2024年第3期689-706,共18页系统工程与电子技术(英文版)
基 金:supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2021YFB1600601);the Joint Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China and the Civil Aviation Administration of China(U1933106);the Scientific Research Project of Tianjin Educational Committee(2019KJ134);the Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin;Intelligent Civil Aviation Program(21JCQNJ C00900)。
摘 要:To solve the problem of risk identification and quantitative assessment for human-computer interaction(HCI)in complex avionics systems,an HCI safety analysis framework based on system-theoretical process analysis(STPA)and cognitive reliability and error analysis method(CREAM)is proposed.STPACREAM can identify unsafe control actions and find the causal path during the interaction of avionics systems and pilot with the help of formal verification tools automatically.The common performance conditions(CPC)of avionics systems in the aviation environment is established and a quantitative analysis of human failure is carried out.Taking the head-up display(HUD)system interaction process as an example,a case analysis is carried out,the layered safety control structure and formal model of the HUD interaction process are established.For the interactive behavior“Pilots approaching with HUD”,four unsafe control actions and35 causal scenarios are identified and the impact of common performance conditions at different levels on the pilot decision model are analyzed.The results show that HUD's HCI level gradually improves as the scores of CPC increase,and the quality of crew member cooperation and time sufficiency of the task is the key to its HCI.Through case analysis,it is shown that STPACREAM can quantitatively assess the hazards in HCI and identify the key factors that impact safety.
关 键 词:AVIONICS human-computer interaction(HCI) safety assessment system-theoretic accident model and process human reliability analysis
分 类 号:V328[航空宇航科学与技术—人机与环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.116.170