检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:项婷婷 XIANG Tingting(School of Law,Huainan Normal University,Huainan 232038,China)
出 处:《湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第3期104-114,共11页Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
基 金:中国法学会2022年度部级法学研究项目(CLS[2022]D61)。
摘 要:解谬刑法解法典化概念,寻求其存在的正当根据,对刑法解法典化进行规范构造,是刑法法典化及刑法法治化的重要一步。刑法解法典化是在肯定法典中心地位前提下法典功能结构的变迁,其正当根据在于,它是与积极刑法观不谋而合的一种思维方式,是法秩序统一下各部门法的和谐需求,是法典化当下的最佳契合形态。在此基础上,对刑法解法典化进行规范构造,构造涵括宪法和指导性案例的刑法解法典化法源范畴,充分发挥刑法修正案的功用,从统一刑法立法模式转向多元立法模式,实现附属刑法从形式意义到实质意义的转变。The conceptual explanation exclusion fallacy in criminal law,seeking a legitimate basis for its existence,and normative construction in decodification of criminal law are important steps in the codification and legalization of criminal law.The decodification of criminal law is the transformation of the functional structure of the code under the premise of affirming the central position of the code.Its legitimate basis lies in the fact that it is a way of thinking that coincides with a positive view of criminal law,a harmonious demand for various departments of law under the unity of legal order,and the best form of fit for codification at present.On this basis,normative construction is carried out for the decodification of criminal law,and a legal source category of the decodification of criminal law that includes the Constitution and guiding cases is constructed.The function of criminal law amendments is fully utilized,shifting from a unified criminal law legislative model to a diversified legislative model,and achieving the transformation of subsidiary criminal law from formal meaning to substantive meaning.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.227.102.8