机构地区:[1]广州市荔湾区金花街道社区卫生服务中心,广东广州510000
出 处:《中外医药研究》2024年第12期58-60,共3页JOURNAL OF CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICINE AND PHARMACY RESEARCH
摘 要:目的:分析“三高共管”综合管理模式应用于“三高症”患者中的效果。方法:选取2021年12月—2022年12月广州市荔湾区金花街道社区卫生服务中心收治的三高症患者67例作为研究对象,以随机抽签法分为对照组(n=33)和管理组(n=34)。对照组给予传统药物治疗,管理组给予传统药物治疗联合“三高共管”一体化服务。比较两组患者血糖、血压、血脂指标,中国慢性病健康素养量表(CHLCC)评分及知觉压力量表(CPSS)评分。结果:干预前,两组患者血糖、血压、血脂指标比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后,管理组患者血糖指标、血压指标、血脂指标均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预前,两组患者CHLCC评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后,两组患者记忆、理解、应用、分析评分均高于干预前,管理组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预前,两组CPSS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后,两组压力紧张感与压力时空感评分均低于干预前,管理组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:“三高共管”一体化服务可提高三高症患者的治疗效果,提升其疾病健康素养水平,降低其心理压力。Objective:To analyze the effect of the“three highs co-management”comprehensive management model applied to patients with three highs disease.Methods:Sixty-seven patients with three highs disease admitted to Guangzhou Liwan District Jinhua Street Community Health Service Center from December 2021 to December 2022 were selected as the study subjects,and were divided into the control group(n=33)and the management group(n=34)by the random draw method.The control group was given traditional medication,while the management group was given traditional medication combined with the“three highs co-management”comprehensive service.The two groups were compared in terms of blood glucose,blood pressure,blood lipid indexes,China Health Literacy Scale for Chronic Diseases(CHLCC)scores and Perceived Stress Scale(CPSS)scores.Results:Before intervention,there was no statistically significant difference between the blood glucose,blood pressure and lipid indicators of the two groups of patients(P>0.05);after intervention,the blood glucose indicators,blood pressure indicators and lipid indicators of the patients in the management group were lower than those of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);before intervention,there was no statistical significance in the difference between the CHLCC scores of the two groups of patients(P>0.05);after intervention,the memory,comprehension,application,and analysis scores of patients in both groups were higher than before intervention,and the management group was higher than the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);before intervention,the CPSS scores of both groups were compared,and the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05);after the intervention,the scores of stress tension and stress temporal and spatial sense of both groups were lower than before the intervention,and the management group was lower than the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:The“three high
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...