不同品牌红外耳温计在儿童患者中的临床应用差异性研究  

Study on the differences of clinical application in pediatric patients for different brands infrared ear thermometers

作　　者：王琳[1,2] 郑彩仙 何林祥 郑焜[2,3] 郦柏平 沈云明[2,3] Wang Lin;Zheng Caixian;He Linxiang;Zheng Kun;Li Baiping;Shen Yunming(Purchsing Department,Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine,Hangzhou 310057,China;National Clinical Research Center for Child Health,Hangzhou 310057,China;Clinical Engineering Department,Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine,Hangzhou 310057)

机构地区：[1]浙江大学医学院附属儿童医院采购中心,杭州310057 [2]国家儿童健康与疾病临床医学研究中心,杭州310057 [3]浙江大学医学院附属儿童医院医疗设备部,杭州310057

出　　处：《中国医学装备》2024年第6期214-216,共3页China Medical Equipment

摘　　要：目的:探讨不同品牌红外耳温计在儿童患者中的临床应用差异性,以指导合理使用红外耳温计。方法:随机选取2023年5月至2023年7月在浙江大学医学院附属儿童医院接受治疗的164例住院及门诊患儿,采用进口(品牌A)、国产(品牌B)和合资(品牌C)3种不同品牌的红外耳温计,以同样的测量方式测量患儿耳温,比较不同品牌耳温计在不同年龄段患儿中测量的温度和时间的差异性。结果:测量温度上,A测量为(37.54±0.931)℃,B为(37.219±0.952)℃,C为(37.329±0.961)℃;测量时间上,A测量时间为(2.34±0.236)s,B为(1.314±0.269)s,C为(2.051±0.173)s。3种耳温计测量温度及时间比较,差异均有统计学意义(F=5.007,264.988,P<0.05)。且3种耳温计测量≤3个月龄患儿的温度,差异有统计学意义(F=3.868,P<0.05);在3月龄以上患儿中无差异。结论:针对不同的年龄段患儿,医疗机构可依据使用成本高低、测量时间快慢等因素综合考虑进行选择。对3个月以上年龄段患儿,选择成本更低、测量时间更快的品牌B红外耳温计;对0~3月龄患儿,建议选择温度测量值更为准确的品牌A红外耳温计。Objective:To explore the differences in the clinical application of different brands of infrared ear thermometers in pediatric patients,and to guide the rational use of infrared ear thermometers.Methods:A total of 164 inpatients and outpatients who received treatment in the Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine from May 2023 to July 2023 were randomly selected,and three different brands of ear thermometers were used to measure the ear temperature of the children in the same measurement method.The differences in temperature and time measured by different brands of ear thermometers in children of different ages were compared.Results:The temperature and time measurements of the three ear thermometers were compared,the difference was statistically significant(F=5.007,264.988,P<0.05).The temperature of children aged≤3 months was measured by the three ear thermometers,and the difference was statistically significant(F=3.868,P<0.05).there was no difference in children aged over 3 months.Conclusion:For children of different ages,medical institutions can make choices based on the comprehensive consideration of the use cost,the speed of measurement time and other factors.For children aged over 3 months,choose product B with lower cost and faster measurement time,for children aged 0-3 months,it is recommended to choose product A with more accurate temperature measurement values.

关 键 词：红外耳温计 温度 测量时间 婴幼儿月龄 差异性 

分 类 号：R197.39[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]