基于代表作制度的学者学术水平评价及文献计量学指标参考价值探讨  

A Discussion on the Evaluation of Scholars’Academic Level Based on the Representative Work System and the Reference Value of Bibliometric Indicators

作　　者：李蓟龙[1] LI Ji-long(Journal Editorial Department,Hebei North University,Zhangjiakou,Hebei 075000,China)

机构地区：[1]河北北方学院神经药理学报编辑部,河北张家口075000

出　　处：《河北北方学院学报（社会科学版）》2024年第2期77-81,共5页Journal of Hebei North University：Social Science Edition

摘　　要：学术评价对学术活动具有重要的导向作用,以科研质量和学术水平为导向的代表作评价逐步被接受并得到应用实践。对科研论文使用量化文献计量学指标评价的结果与同行评议的结果差异极小,可在一定条件限制下进行代表作筛选。文献计量学指标h指数可同时反映被引最高频次的论文数量及被引量,在评价学者学术水平时,以h指数为基础,参考最高引用论文的引用频次和论文发表时间范围,根据不同学科活跃度和规模确定学者的代表作,可尽可能客观地体现作者的学术水平。Academic evaluation plays an important guiding role in academic activities.Representative work evaluation guided by scientific research quality and academic level is gradually accepted and applied in practice.There is little difference between the results of the evaluation of scientific papers using quantitative bibliometric indicators and the results of peer review,and the representative works can be screened under certain conditions.The bibliometric index h can reflect both the number of papers with the highest citation frequency and the number of citations.Scholars’academic level can be evaluated according to the citation frequency of the most citated paper and the publication time range of the paper on the basis of the h index,and the determination of the representative works of scholars according to the activity and scale of different discipline can reflect the author’s academic level as objectively as possible.

关 键 词：代表作制度 文献计量学指标 学术评价 H指数 类h指数 

分 类 号：G644[文化科学—高等教育学]