刑事司法解释溯及力规则研究——对高检发释字[2001]5号合理性之证成  

On the Rules of Retroactivity of Criminal Judicial Interpretation--Proof of the Rationality of Interpretation(2001)No.5 Issued by the Supreme People's Procuratorate

作　　者：姚培培 姚欣雅 YAO Pei-pei;YAO Xin-ya(School of Criminal Justice,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China)

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学刑事司法学院,湖北武汉430073

出　　处：《政法学刊》2024年第2期57-66,共10页Journal of Political Science and Law

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目(22CFX062);2023年度中南财经政法大学中央高校基本科研业务费项目(202310709);2024年度中南财经政法大学中央高校基本科研业务费项目(2722024BQ036)。

摘　　要：刑事司法解释应否有溯及力的问题一直未得出定论。该问题的实质判断标准应是刑事司法解释是否损害国民值得保护的信赖利益。据此,行为时没有相关司法解释的,由于国民的信赖与之后施行的司法解释相符,因此现行司法解释没有损害国民信赖利益,应具有溯及力;行为时已有相关司法解释的,由于国民对旧司法解释已形成相应的信赖,因此新司法解释较旧司法解释不利时,损害了国民信赖利益,应采取从旧兼从轻原则。故我国《关于适用刑事司法解释时间效力问题的规定》相关内容具有实质合理性。The issue of whether criminal judicial interpretation should have retroactive effect has been left open.The substantive criterion for determining this issue should be whether the criminal judicial interpretation has jeopardized the national's trust interests that are worth protecting.According to this,if there is no relevant judicial interpretation at the time of act,because the national's trust is consistent with the later judicial interpretation,the current judicial interpretation does not harm the national trust interest and should have retroactive effect;if there is already a relevant judicial interpretation at the time of act,because the people have formed corresponding trust in the old judicial interpretation,when the new judicial interpretation is disadvantageous to the old judicial interpretation,it damages the national trust interest,and the principle of observing old laws and adopting light punishment should be adopted.Therefore,the relevant content of the Provisions on the Temporal Effect of the Application of Criminal Judicial Interpretations has substantive rationality.

关 键 词：刑事司法解释 溯及力 信赖利益 从新 从旧兼从轻 

分 类 号：DF613[政治法律—刑法学]