在思想与行动之间:脑机接口行动及其心身之辩  

Between Thought and Action:BCI-Actions and the Mind-Body Debate

作　　者：李珍 LI Zhen

机构地区：[1]中山大学马克思主义学院,广东广州510275

出　　处：《上海师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2024年第3期33-40,共8页Journal of Shanghai Normal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“多元物理主义框架下的心理因果性问题研究”(21FZXB064);国家社科基金重大项目“负责任的人工智能及其实践的哲学研究”(21&ZD063);广州市哲学社会科学发展“十四五”规划2023年度课题“数字时代马克思主义理论创新与传播研究”(2023GZYB01)。

摘　　要：脑机接口的出现革新了人类的行动方式——以思行事,这为传统的行动理论带来了挑战。一种观点认为,脑机接口行动并非身体行动,而是具有外部结果的心理行动;另一种观点则认为,触发脑机接口行动的直接原因并非行动体的意向状态,而是其想象力或注意力。这些观点均与标准的行动理论相悖,因此,行动理论亟待修正。实际上,这些矛盾源于对心身概念及其关系的误解,其后果是掉入二元论陷阱。将脑机接口行动视作身体行动相较于心理行动更为贴切,未来的脑机接口技术若能充分提升用户的感觉反馈,它便有望成为一种高度具身化的技术。人们无须构建全新的行动理论以适应脑机接口,只需对现有的行动理论进行合理阐释与拓展。Brain-computer interfaces(BCI)have changed the way of humans actions,and humans can do things directly through their thoughts.These facts have brought challenges to traditional theory of action.Some scholars believe that BCI-actions are“mental act with an external effect”,because they do not need a bodily movement.Other scholars believe the direct causation of BCI-actions are agent’s imagination or attention,instead of intentionality.These views show BCI-actions are inconformity to the standard action theory,therefore,the action theory should be revised.In fact,this dilemma stems from a misunderstanding of the concept of mind,body and its relationship,which leads to falling into the trap of dualism.BCI-actions should be interpreted as bodily actions rather than mental actions.BCI will become a highly embodied technology if the user’s sensory feedback could also be improved.There is no need to construct a completely new theory of action to accommodate BCI-actions,and it is suffi-cient to reasonably interpret and extend the existing theories of action.

关 键 词：脑机接口 行动因果理论 具身性 身体行动 心理行动 

分 类 号：TP18[自动化与计算机技术—控制理论与控制工程]