前科的入罪评价与累犯评价重复性探析  

To Analyze Whether the Offender Whose Previous Record Has Been Assessed as a Crime Can Be Evaluated as a Recidivist

作　　者：张艳青 韩杨阳 Zhang Yanqing;Han Yangyang

机构地区：[1]北京市人民检察院法律政策研究室

出　　处：《北京政法职业学院学报》2024年第2期92-99,共8页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law

摘　　要：我国刑事立法上确实存在重复评价的现象,但这不能成为司法实践中违反禁止重复评价原则的理由。禁止重复评价原则可以适用于刑事实体法中定罪量刑全过程,适用于一切与定罪量刑有关的事实,对同一事实进行不同角度、不同程度的评价仍属于重复评价。应当注意,充分评价原则不能与禁止重复评价原则对立,相反,充分评价原则的适用应以不违反禁止重复评价原则为前提。而且,禁止定罪情节重复作为量刑情节适用,与定罪情节中的多余事实作为量刑情节裁量并非一回事。对于仅有一个犯罪前科事实且符合累犯成立条件,该犯罪前科已在定罪中予以评价,但因该犯罪前科同样符合一般累犯情节,在量刑环节中则不能认定为累犯。The phenomenon of repeated evaluation does exist in criminal legislation in our country,but this can not be a reason for violating the principle of prohibiting repeated evaluation in judicial practice.The principle of prohibiting repeated evaluation can be applied to the whole process of conviction and sentencing in substantive criminal law,and to all facts related to conviction and sentencing,and the evaluation of the same fact from different angles and to different degrees is still a repeated evaluation.It should be noted that the principle of adequate evaluation cannot be the opposite of the principle of prohibiting repeated evaluation.On the contrary,the principle of adequate evaluation should be applied on the premise that it does not violate the principle of prohibiting repeated evaluation.Moreover,the prohibition of repetition of the circumstances of conviction as the application of sentencing circumstances is not the same as the superfluous facts in the circumstances of conviction as the discretion of sentencing circumstances.For the fact that there is only one criminal record and meets the conditions for the establishment of a recidivist,the criminal record has been evaluated in the conviction,but because the criminal record also meets the general recidivist circumstances,it cannot be identified as a recidivist in the sentencing link.

关 键 词：禁止重复评价原则 充分评价 前科 累犯 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]