髋关节镜下可吸收螺钉修复髋臼软骨分层损伤的早期疗效  

The early effect of absorbable anchor repairing acetabular cartilage delamination under hip arthroscopy

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:董寒梅 刘余昊 焦辰波 刘振龙[1] 徐雁[1] Dong Hanmei;Liu Yuhao;Jiao Chenbo;Liu Zhenlong;Xu Yan(Department of Sports Medicine,Peking University Third Hospital(Institute of Sports Medicine of Peking University,Beijing Key Laboratory of Sports Injuries,Engineering Reseach Center of Sports Trauma Treatment Technology and Devices,Ministry of Education),Beijing 100191,China)

机构地区:[1]北京大学第三医院运动医学科(北京大学运动医学研究所,运动医学关节伤病北京市重点实验室,运动创伤治疗技术与器械教育部工程研究中心),北京100191

出  处:《中华骨科杂志》2024年第10期685-691,共7页Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics

基  金:北京市自然科学基金委重点项目(Z200003);北医三院临床队列建设项目C类(BYSYDL2021024);北京大学第三医院青年孵育基金(BYSYFY2021038)。

摘  要:目的探讨髋关节镜下可吸收螺钉治疗髋臼软骨分层损伤的早期疗效。方法回顾性收集2021年5月至2021年8月北京大学第三医院收治的股骨髋臼撞击症合并髋臼软骨分层损伤的患者24例,男14例、女10例,年龄(36.3±7.2)岁(范围23~53岁)。可吸收螺钉组12例,采用可吸收螺钉修复髋臼软骨分层损伤;旷置组12例,采用传统旷置方法。比较两组手术前后X线片测量的α角、外侧中心边缘角(lateral center edge angle,LCEA)以及MRI测量的髋臼软骨间隙。术前及末次随访时采用疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、改良Harris髋关节评分(modified Harris hip score,mHHS)、国际髋关节结果工具(12-item international hip outcome tool,iHOT12)评分、髋关节日常活动评分(hip outcome score-activities of daily living subscale,HOS-ADL)、髋关节运动评分(hip outcome score-sports subscale,HOS-SS)评估髋关节功能。随访期内观察并发症(感染、下肢静脉血栓形成)及接受髋关节镜翻修术或全髋关节置换术的比例。结果24例均获得随访,随访时间(12.0±1.2)个月(范围10~14个月)。可吸收螺钉组与旷置组的年龄、体质指数、病程的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组术前α角、LCEA、髋臼软骨间隙、mHHS、iHOT12评分、HOS-ADL、HOS-SS及VAS的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。末次随访时两组α角、LCEA、髋臼软骨间隙、mHHS、iHOT12评分、HOS-ADL、HOS-SS、VAS及患者满意度的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。可吸收螺钉组术后α角为47.2°±2.6°、髋臼软骨间隙为(3.0±0.7)mm、mHHS为(73.6±16.0)分、iHOT12为(67.6±22.5)分,与术前[63.4°±3.3°、(3.3±0.6)mm、(57.7±15.4)分、(50.6±15.0)分]的差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);旷置组术后α角为47.4°±2.6°,较术前的58.4°±8.1°降低,差异有统计学意义(t=5.081,P=0.000),而LCEA、髋臼软骨间隙、mHHS、iHOT12评分、HOS-ADL、HOS-SS、VAS与术前的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。Objective To investigate the early effect of repairing acetabular cartilage delamination with absorbable anchor under hip arthroscopy compared with conventional non-intervention.Methods Retrospective cohort study was adopted.There were 24 Femoroacetabular Impingment(FAI)patients with acetabular cartilage delamination(ACD)receiving hip arthroscopy surgery in Peking University Third Hospital from May 2021 to August 2021.There were 14 males and 10 females with an average age of 36.3±7.2 years(range 23-53 years).There were 12 patients receiving acetabular cartilage repair with absorbable anchor(absorbable anchor group),and 12 patients in non-intervention group.The X-ray film indicators,αangle,lateral center edge angle(LCEA)and MRI measurement(acetabular cartilage gap,CG)were compared between the two groups.The pre-and post-operative hip functions were assessed by modified Harris Hip Score(mHHS),12-item international hip outcome tool(iHOT12),hip outcome score-activities of daily living subscale(HOS-ADL),and hip outcome score-sports subscale(HOS-SS),along with visual analogue scale(VAS).The complications(infection,lower extremity deep venous thrombosis)were followed up,as well as the revisional hip arthroscopy surgery and total hip replacement surgery.Results A total of 24 patients were followed up for 12.0±1.2 months(range 10-14 months).There was no significant difference between the two groups for age,BMI,and symptom onset time(P>0.05).There was no significant difference between the two groups for the pre-operativeαangle,LCEA,CG,mHHS,iHOT12,HOS-ADL,HOS-SS,and VAS scores(P>0.05).At the last follow-up,there was no significant difference between the two groups for theαangle,LCEA,CG,mHHS,iHOT12,HOS-ADL,HOS-SS,VAS and satisfaction(P>0.05).In the absorbable anchor group,theαangle was 47.2°±2.6°vs.63.4°±3.3°,CG was 3.0±0.7 mm vs.3.3±0.6 mm;mHHS was 73.6±16.0 vs.57.7±15.4;iHOT12 was 67.6±22.5 vs.50.6±15.0 after and before the surgery,with significant improvement(P<0.05).As for the non-intervention group,the

关 键 词: 关节镜检查 股骨髋臼撞击征 软骨修复 

分 类 号:R687.3[医药卫生—骨科学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象