论国际裁判中的司法政策  

On Judicial Policy in International Adjudications

作　　者：朱利江[1] Zhu Lijiang

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学国际法学院

出　　处：《中国法学》2024年第3期287-304,共18页China Legal Science

基　　金：2019年度国家社科基金一般项目“国家官员外国刑事管辖豁免研究”(项目批准号:19BFX198)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：无论是规则定向的国际法思维还是政策定向的国际法思维,均承认国际裁判中存在体现国际裁判主体特定价值追求、哲学理念、道德倾向或利益偏好的司法政策。国际裁判主体凭借“国际法渊源”“国际法规范”“条约解释”“附带意见”“司法建议”五种司法技巧将司法政策巧妙地“溶解”在其裁判中。这种司法现象的产生与国际法的模糊性、国际争端的政治性、国际裁判权的独立性密切相关。目前,国际裁判主体在运用司法政策时存在“法治真空”的问题,容易产生不良社会效果,因此应从价值、规范和机制三个层面着手推动和构建国际裁判中司法政策的法治化。我国已对国际裁判主体表达正当期待,未来还可在国际裁判人员的选举、国际组织决议草案及条约修改草案的提交等方面发挥更积极的作用。The presence of judicial policy demonstrating the particular value guide,philosophical perception,moral inclination,or interest preference in international adjudications has been acknowledged by international law academics either with rule-based thinking or policy-based thinking.International adjudicative bodies use‘sources of international law',‘international legal norms',‘treaty interpretation',obiter dicta',and judicial recommendations'to skillfully integrate‘judicial policy'into the judgments.This judicial phenomenon results from the ambiguity of international law,the politics of international disputes,and the independence of international adjudicative power.The use of judicial policy by international tribunals has the problem of a‘rule of law lacuna'and thus should be based on the rule of law,which can be realized by value-settings,norm-creating and institution-building.China has already appealed to pay attention to judicial policy in international adjudications and could also play a more active role in this process by selecting international judges,submitting proposals to international organizations and conferences and relevant treaty modification proposals.

关 键 词：国际裁判 司法政策 司法技巧 国际争端 国际法治 

分 类 号：D994[政治法律—国际法学]