检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱宇晴 ZHU Yu-qing
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学刑事法学院
出 处:《河北法律职业教育》2024年第4期108-112,共5页HEBEI VOCATIONAL EDUCATION OF LAW
摘 要:兼具欺骗与胁迫性质的索财行为之罪名认定存在争议,关于两罪关系有单一说与竞合说之争,竞合说又包括法条竞合说与想象竞合说。两罪是完全的互斥关系,并且从被害人心理的角度而言,两罪的本质不同在于被害人是否拥有意志自由。因此当被害人丧失意志自由时,行为人则构成敲诈勒索罪;反之构成诈骗罪。至于如何认定被害人是否具备意志自由,仍需回归被告人的行为,根据其索财依据与索财行为进行客观化判断。There is controversy over the classification of the crime of seeking money,which combines elements of deception and coercion.The dispute revolves around the relationship between two crimes:the unitary theory and the concurrent theory,with the concurrent theory encompassing the theories of statutory concurrency and hypothetical concurrency.These two crimes are completely mutually exclusive,and from the perspective of victim psychology,the essential difference between the two crimes lies in whether the victim possesses free will.Therefore,when the victim loses their free will,the perpetrator commits the crime of extortion;otherwise,it constitutes the crime of fraud.As for how to determine whether the victim has free will,it is necessary to examine the defendant's behavior and make an objective judgment based on the grounds for seeking money and the actions taken to seek money.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7