检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨瑞 栗飞 YANG Rui;LI Fei(Shanxi Provincial Highway Bureau Jincheng Branch,Jincheng,Shanxi 048000,China)
出 处:《黑龙江交通科技》2024年第6期79-83,共5页Communications Science and Technology Heilongjiang
摘 要:以运城市槐东路上跨南同蒲铁路转体桥为例,就T构方案和连续梁方案在E2地震水准下进行分析对比。结论为:(1)减隔震方案主墩受力大大减小;(2)常规配筋情况下,T构方案E2下抗震能力不足,减隔震方案满足要求;(3)减隔震方案桥梁主墩抗震安全性相对T构方案提高30倍以上。最终该工程选用减隔震方案,为相关工程案例的抗震方案设计提供了一种参考。Taking the example of the rotatable bridge crossing South Datong-Puzhou Railway of Huaidong Road in Yuncheng City,this paper analyzes and compares the T-structure scheme and the continuous beam scheme under the E2 earthquake level.The conclusion is:(1)The seismic isolation scheme significantly reduces the stress on the main pier;(2)Under conventional reinforcement conditions,the seismic capacity of T-structure scheme E2 is insufficient,and the seismic isolation scheme meets the requirements;(3)The seismic safety of the bridge main pier is mare than 30 times higher than that of the T-structure scheme.The final selection of seismic isolation scheme for this project provides a reference for the seismic design of relevant engineering cases.
分 类 号:U442[建筑科学—桥梁与隧道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.106.159