量子力学的逆向因果争论及其辨析  

On the Debates and Analysis of Backward Causation in Quantum Mechanics

作　　者：孙圣 SUN Sheng(School of Philosophy and Society,Northwest Normal University,Lanzhou 730070,China)

机构地区：[1]西北师范大学哲学与社会学院,兰州730070

出　　处：《科学技术哲学研究》2024年第3期41-47,共7页Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“科学思想实验的划界问题研究”(22YJC720015)。

摘　　要：逆向因果常见于承诺时间反演对称性的量子力学哲学解释中,刘易斯使用过度决定论对逆向因果进行哲学审视,这在逆向因果现阶段的主要科学哲学争论中占据重要位置。研究发现,对因果关系中的事件做精细个化的思想实验不是任意的,需要在物理律则允许的范围内进行。沿用普赖斯的进路,以汉弗莱斯的熔合突现论为例,研究说明了直觉何以在批评逆向因果问题上存在不充分性,一定程度的回应了刘易斯对逆向因果的指责。Backward causation normally presents in philosophical interpretations of quantum mechanics committing time reversal symmetric characteristics,on which is philosophically reviewed by Lewis from a perspective of overde-termination.It holds key position in the major scientific philosophical debates of backward causation at this stage.Study shows that thought experiments operating on fine-grained individuation of events in causation are not arbi-trary,that is,they appropriately yield to physical laws.According to Price's approach,this paper is citing fusion emergence of Humphreys as typical of the inadequacy of criticism of backward causation,which responses to Lew-is'opposition to backward causation to some extent.

关 键 词：逆向因果作用 科学思想实验 量子力学的哲学解释 时间反演非对称性 熔合突现论 

分 类 号：N02[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]