冲突化视域下德媒关于RCEP报道的辩题策略研究  

Argumentative Discourse of German Medias’Reports on the RCEP:A Perspective of Agonistic Strategy

作　　者：樊星星 陈琦[2] FAN Xingxing;CHEN Qi(Kaiserslautern Intelligent Manufacturing School,Shanghai Dianji University,Shanghai,201306,China;College of Foreign Languages,University of Shanghai for Science and Technology,Shanghai 200093,China)

机构地区：[1]上海电机学院凯撒斯劳滕智能制造学院,上海201306 [2]上海理工大学外语学院,上海200093

出　　处：《上海理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第3期226-232,共7页Journal of University of Shanghai for Science and Technology：Social Sciences Edition

摘　　要：以“冲突化”理论和“语篇-历史分析法”中的辩题策略为分析框架,结合定量和定性分析方法,研究了LexisNexis新闻数据库中德国媒体2012至2021年关于区域全面经济伙伴关系协定(RCEP)协议报道中的辩题策略。研究发现,德媒在对RCEP事件进行报道时并非仅使用“危险/威胁”辩题策略而构建中国经济的负面形象,而是根据不同的冲突主体对各种冲突关系采取了不同的辩题策略。这项研究有助于我国在宣传自我形象时正确认识和应对德国媒体所塑造的中国经济负面形象,并为我国构建对外话语体系提供参考。This article studies the discourse strategy of the German media’s reports on the RCEP agreements from the database LexisNexis News during 2012-2021.Under theory of agonistic strategy,we analyzed the argumentation strategy with the discourse-historical methodology.It is found that German media usually represent conflicting relations by means of“conflictization”,constructing conflict subjects rather than a negative Chinese economic image by“dangerous/threatening”argumentation.The Gemeran medias used different topos on the different agonistic relations.This study helps to reshape our economic image and contribute to establish our diplomatic discourse system.

关 键 词：冲突化 辩题策略 区域全面经济伙伴关系协定 德国媒体 

分 类 号：H334[语言文字—德语]