真实性:怎样以及在何种意义上成为沈石溪式的问题?  

Authenticity:How and in What Sense Has It Become a Shen Shixi Style's Issue?

作　　者：许廷顺 XU Tingshun(Zhang Wei Literature Research Institute,Ludong University,Yantai 264039,China)

机构地区：[1]鲁东大学张炜文学研究院,山东烟台264039

出　　处：《鲁东大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2024年第3期50-57,共8页Ludong University Journal:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition

摘　　要：对于沈石溪创作的“物性真实”问题,目前学界仍存在较大争议。从此前学界没有或较少涉及但仍具意义的动物的取名、动物的动作、动物的交流等细节来看,沈石溪被学界惯称的所谓“兽面人心”艺术模式,即使在“兽面”这个层次,其真实性也是不成立的。从学界争论较多的具体问题来看,沈石溪的创作意旨、文本修辞与读者阅读三者之间存在复杂的错位和矛盾关系。With regard to the issue of“material authenticity”in Shen Shixi's creation,there exists a greater dispute in the academic circle at present.Seen from such details as animal naming,animal movements,animal communication that were not or were rarely mentioned by the academic circle before but are still meaningful now,the authenticity of so-called Shen Shixi's“a beast in human face”art model commonly called by the academic circle is invalid even on the level of“beast face”.Seen from the more specific issues argued about in the academic circle,there exist the complex dislocation and contradictory relationship among his creative intention,textual rhetoric,and reader appreciation.

关 键 词：沈石溪 动物小说 真实性 错位 争议 

分 类 号：I207.8[文学—中国文学]