2022—2023年《保健医学研究与实践》外审退稿护理论文特征分析  

Characteristics analysis of nursing manuscripts rejected by external review from Health Medicine Research and Practice in 2022-2023

作　　者：戴丽[1] 李佳 黄文杰[1] 韦晗 胡永国[1] Dai Li;Li Jia;Huang Wenjie;Wei Han;Hu Yongguo(Editorial Office of Health Medicine Research and Practice,Southwest University,Chongqing 400715,China;Departmentof Nursing,Zhuhai Campus of Zunyi Medical University,Zhuhai Guangdong 401120,China;Departmentof Anesthesiology,The People's Hospital of Nanchuan Chongqing,Chongqing 408400,China)

机构地区：[1]西南大学《保健医学研究与实践》编辑部,重庆400715 [2]遵义医科大学珠海校区护理学系,广东珠海401120 [3]重庆市南川区人民医院麻醉科,重庆408400

出　　处：《保健医学研究与实践》2024年第3期117-122,共6页Health Medicine Research and Practice

基　　金：中国高校科技期刊研究会“善锋软件基金”(CUJS2023-SF016)。

摘　　要：目的探讨2022—2023年《保健医学研究与实践》外审退稿护理论文特征,以期为临床护理人员科研工作提供参考,提高护理类论文质量和稿件录用率。方法本研究选取2022—2023年本刊外审退稿护理论文130篇为研究对象。收集各论文的基本情况,包括第一作者单位所在地区、单位性质[医疗卫生机构(级别、是否为高校附属医院)还是高等学校]、是否有基金项目、第一作者学历、第一作者职称、论文类型、论文合作人数、详细退稿意见。结果第一作者单位所在省份以河南居首,占52.31%。第一作者单位性质以医疗机构为主,占99.23%。基金项目方面以没有基金项目为主,占80.00%。其中,一级医院占1.55%(2/129),二级医院占11.63%(15/129),三级医院占86.82%(112/129);高校附属医院占27.13%(35/129),非附属医院占72.87%(94/129)。第一作者学历以本科为主,占94.61%。第一作者职称以中级为主,占58.46%。论文类型以论著为主,占96.92%。外审退稿论文的退稿原因中占比前3位的依次是缺乏创新性,观察指标选择不恰当或不完整,研究组(干预组均统一命名为研究组)干预方法与对照组雷同或混淆,分别占98.46%、92.31%、84.62%。124篇论著的干预措施主要是针对性护理、预见性护理、集束化护理、延续性护理、人性化护理、多学科协作护理模式、循证护理等,分别占11.29%、6.45%、5.64%、6.44%、4.83%、4.83%、4.03%。120篇论文退稿原因均有观察指标选择不恰当或不完整。归纳具体的退稿原因包括:观察指标和干预措施相互隔离,测评的指标不是干预的内容(92.50%);测评指标意义不大(21.67%);测评指标没有主次(99.17%);测评指标与干预措施因果关系存疑(49.17%);测评指标可行性不强(31.67%);测评指标选择过于简单(19.17%)。结论临床护士的科研素养还有很大的提升空间。尤其需对他们进行选题、观察指标选择、干预方案书写方�Objective This study aimed to explore the characteristics of nursing manuscripts rejected by external review from Health Medicine Research and Practice in 2022-2023,to provide support for clinical nursing staff's research,and to promote the quality and acceptance rate of nursing manuscripts.Methods The study selected 130 nursing manuscripts rejected by external review from this journal in 2022-2023.The basic information of each manuscript was collected,including the region where the first author's institution is located,the nature of the institution[medical and health institutions(grade level,whether affiliated with a university)or higher education institutions],whether there was a funding project,the first author's educational background,the first author's professional title,the type of manuscript,the number of collaborators,and detailed rejection comments.Results The province with the most first author affiliations was Henan,accounting for 52.31%.The institutions of the first authors were primarily medical institutions,accounting for 99.23%.Regarding funding projects,the majority did not have any,representing 80.00%.Among these,primary hospitals accounted for 1.55%(2/129),secondary hospitals for 11.63%(15/129),and tertiary hospitals for 86.82%(112/129);university-affiliated hospitals accounted for 27.13%(35/129),and non-affiliated hospitals for 72.87%(94/129).The first author's education level was predominantly undergraduate,making up 94.61%.The primary professional title of the first authors was intermediate,accounting for 58.46%;the main type of manuscript was research papers,accounting for 96.92%.The top three reasons for manuscript rejection by external review were a lack of innovation,inappropriate or incomplete selection of observation in-dicators,and intervention methods in the study group(all intervention groups were uniformly named study groups)being similar or confused with the control group,accounting for 98.46%,92.31%,and 84.62%,respectively.The main inter-vention measures in 124 research papers wer

关 键 词：护理 论文质量 外审退稿 科研素养 

分 类 号：R47[医药卫生—护理学] H15[医药卫生—临床医学]