环境司法专门化中“三审合一”模式的局限及完善路径  

The Limitation and Perfection Path of‘Three-Trials-in-One’Model in the Environmental Justice Specialization

作　　者：胡钰婷 HU Yuting(Wangjian Law School,Suzhou University,Suzhou Jiangsu 215021,China)

机构地区：[1]苏州大学王健法学院,江苏苏州215021

出　　处：《新疆环境保护》2024年第2期46-52,共7页Environmental Protection of Xinjiang

摘　　要：“三审合一”审判模式作为环境资源案件审理的创新模式,在司法实践中存在着审判程序衔接无序、专门化审判人员稀缺等诸多问题。通过分析印度、瑞典等国家在环境司法专门化进程中的经验得出可供我国“三审合一”模式发展的路径,即“三审合一”模式应从立法层面确定该模式合法性,诉讼程序应适用分类审理的方式,全国范围内审判机构的设立应统一规划,专业化“三审合一”司法人员应得到系统培养。The"three trials in one"trial model,as an innovative model for the trial of environmental resource cases,faced many problems in judicial practice,such as disorderly connection of trial procedures and scarcity of specialized judges.By analyzing the experience of India,Sweden and other countries in the process of environmental judicial specialization,we could draw a path for the development of China's"threetrialsinone"model.It was that the legitimacy of the"three-trials-in-one"model should be determined from the legislative level;the litigation procedure should apply the method of classified trial;the establishment of judicial institutions nationwide should be uniformly planned;and specialized judicial personnel should be trained should be systematically trained.

关 键 词：环境司法专门化 三审合一 环境资源案件 

分 类 号：D922.68[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]