检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李正旺 胡齐轩 王晨阳 LI Zhengwang;HU Qixuan;WANG Chenyang(School of Economics,Wuhan Textile University,Wuhan Hubei 430200,China)
出 处:《武汉纺织大学学报》2024年第3期101-106,共6页Journal of Wuhan Textile University
摘 要:文章探讨财政教育支出对城乡居民消费差距的影响。使用了中国2005—2021年的省级面板数据,运用了固定效应模型来分析财政教育支出和城乡居民消费差距之间的关系。文章的主要发现如下:人均财政教育支出对城乡居民消费差距有显著的负向影响,即财政教育支出的增加会缩小城乡居民消费差距。这一结果说明了财政教育支出对城乡居民消费差距有挤入效应。财政教育支出可以有效地缩小城乡居民消费差距,提高农村居民的消费水平,但是这种效果在较发达地区并不明显,可能需要更多的政策支持和资源投入。文章提出了一些政策建议,包括加大对农村地区教育事业的投入、引导和满足农村居民教育需求、完善对农村劳动力就业和创业的支持和服务等。This paper explores the impact of fiscal education expenditure on urban-rural consumption gap.Using provincial panel data from China from 2005 to 2021,we employ a fixed effects model to analyze the relationship between fiscal education expenditure and urban-rural consumption gap.The main findings of this paper are as follows:percapita fiscal education expenditure has a significant negative impact on urban-rural consumption gap,that is,the increase of fiscal education expenditure will narrow the urban-rural consumption gap.This result indicates that fiscal education expenditure has a crowding-in effect on urban-rural consumption gap.Fiscal education expenditure can effectively narrow the urban-rural consumption gap and improve the consumption level of rural residents,but this effect is not obvious in more developed regions,which may require more policy support and resource input.This paper puts forward some policy suggestions,including increasing the investment in rural education,guiding and satisfying the education demand of rural residents,improving the support and service for rural labor employment and entrepreneurship,etc.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.251.83