检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:戴琳剑 Dai Linjian
机构地区:[1]浙江大学历史学院
出 处:《海交史研究》2024年第1期72-82,共11页Journal of Maritime History Studies
摘 要:1687年朝鲜人金泰璜等人漂到安南后被清商由海路送还,此后朝鲜政府从陆路将清商送还,清廷则借此机会明确了朝鲜应对中国船只的具体方法。通过分析可知,清商之所以愿意送还金泰璜等人,除了出于人道主义之外,还带有逐利的目的。另外,朝鲜从本国海禁和对清关系角度出发,选择从陆路送还清商,结果促使清廷发咨朝鲜,希望后者能积极应对中国的贸易船,也间接明确了朝鲜应对中国漂人的方法。In 1687,several Joseon castaways,including Kim Taehwang,drifted to Annan and were brought back to their homeland by the merchants from the Qing Dynasty by sea.Later on,the Joseon government returned Chinese merchants by land,and the Qing court took this opportunity to clarify the specific response measures for Joseon to deal with Qing ships accidentally landing there.This paper argues that the reason why the merchants from Qing were willing to return Joseon castaways was not only for humanitarianism but also for profit.Also,this paper contends that Joseon decided to return the merchants to Qing by land due to the Qing haijin or sea ban policy and its relations with Qing.The behaviour prompted Qing court to send an official communication to Joseon with the hope that the trade ships from Qing could be treated kindly by Joseon.This indirectly clarified how Joseon dealt with Chinese castaways.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7