检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:霍攀 王勇 Huo Pan;Wang Yong(Jiangxi Engineering Survey and Research Institute of Nuclear Industry Co.,Ltd,Nanchang 330096;School of Municipal and Environmental Engineering,Henan University of Urban Construction,Pingdingshan 467000)
机构地区:[1]核工业江西工程勘察研究总院有限公司,江西南昌330096 [2]河南城建学院市政与环境工程学院,河南平顶山467000
出 处:《石材》2024年第7期105-107,共3页Stone
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(41972281);河南省高等学校重点科研项目指导计划(24B410001)。
摘 要:以巴基斯坦某电厂桩基承载力检测为目的,分别采用静载试验法和高应变动力检测法对旋挖法和反循环法两种成桩工艺的四根试桩进行承载力检测,并对结果进行了对比分析。结果表明,静载试验与高应变法实测四根试桩的承载力特征值均大于设计承载力特征值,均满足设计要求;两种方法对不同成桩工艺桩基承载力的检测结果均具有较好的一致性,采用高应变法代替静载试验在该地区进行桩基承载力检测具有较强的可行性和适用性;为该地区桩基承载力检测提供参考和借鉴。For the purpose of testing the bearing capacity of pile foundations in a power plant in Pakistan,static load test method and high strain dynamic test method were used to test the bearing capacity of four test piles using the rotary excavation method and the reverse circulation method.The results were compared and analyzed.The results show that the bearing capacity characteristic values of the four test piles measured by static load test and high strain method are all greater than the design bearing capacity characteristic values,which meet the design requirements;These two methods have good consistency in the detection results of pile foundation bearing capacity with different pile forming processes.The application of the high strain method instead of static load test for pile foundation bearing capacity detection in this region has strong feasibility and applicability,which provides references for the detection of pile foundation bearing capacity in this region.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.26.90