检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姜晨曦 Chenxi Jiang(Law School,Xinjiang University of Finance and Economics,Urumqi Xinjiang)
机构地区:[1]新疆财经大学法学院,新疆乌鲁木齐
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2024年第4期2065-2070,共6页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:死刑作为一种生命刑,其存在的合法性和必要性一直存在激烈的争论。为了避免冤假错案的发生,确保司法公正,死刑的行使必须经过严格的程序和审查。中国古代死刑复核制度是一项独特的司法制度,其在控制滥用死刑、保障人权和避免司法失误等方面具有一定的借鉴意义。本文旨在从历史的角度切入,研究中国古代死刑复核制度的思想基础、演变历程及特点,探讨其对我国现代司法体制的借鉴意义。The legality and necessity of the existence of the death penalty as a form of life penalty have always been fiercely debated.In order to avoid the occurrence of wrongful cases and ensure judicial fairness,the exercise of the death penalty must go through strict procedures and scrutiny.The ancient Chinese death penalty review system is a unique judicial system that has certain reference significance in controlling the abuse of the death penalty,protecting human rights,and avoiding judicial errors.This article aims to study the evolution and characteristics of the ancient Chinese death penalty review system from a historical perspective,and explore its reference significance for the modern judicial system in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.218.181.138