检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贾雨欣 Yuxin Jia(College of Law,Yangzhou University,Yangzhou Jiangsu)
机构地区:[1]扬州大学法学院,江苏扬州
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2024年第4期2231-2237,共7页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:从古至今,中国传统法制长期秉持着重内容、轻形式的理念,倾向于把法律程序当作一种工具,辅助法律实体目的的实现。近年来,随着法制改革的推进,人们普遍关注到了程序性规定对健全法制的重要意义,但是在实践中人们也逐渐认识到法律程序自身存在着无法克服的局限性。本文以辩证的视角重新审视了法律程序的价值与缺陷,归纳出了主要原因,并结合对法律程序运行现状的分析,提出了针对性的措施,以期为我国法律程序的演变和发展提供可行性建议。Since ancient times,the traditional Chinese legal system has long adhered to the concept of emphasizing content and neglecting form,and tends to use legal procedures as a tool to assist the realization of the purpose of legal entities.In recent years,with the advancement of the reform of the legal system,people have generally paid attention to the significance of procedural provisions to the improvement of the legal system,but in practice people have gradually realized that the legal process itself has insurmountable limitations.This paper re-examines the value and defects of legal procedures from a dialectical perspective,summarizes two main reasons,and puts forward targeted measures based on the analysis of the current situation of legal procedures,in order to provide feasible suggestions for the evolution and development of legal procedures in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.251.232