检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘淑瑶 Shuyao Liu(College of Law,Yangzhou University,Yangzhou Jiangsu)
机构地区:[1]扬州大学法学院,江苏扬州
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2024年第4期2238-2245,共8页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:生态文明入宪具有重大的时代意义,环境权入宪与否问题再一次引起关注,此时,应当对环境权入宪的必要性问题进行冷静的思考。首先,环境权的权利性质和权利主体并不明确;其次,环境权与现有的宪法基本权利体系存在冲突且其可诉性也存在争议;再次,环境权入宪可能会对宪法带来不利影响,造成宪法权利的泛化,削弱宪法的权威;最后,环境权入宪并非实现环境治理的最佳方式,以宪法为统领,通过对各部门法的进一步细化构建“国家目标”型的环境治理模式,才能更好地发挥效用。The inclusion of ecological civilisation in the constitution is of great significance in this era,and the question of whether environmental rights should be included in the constitution has once again attracted attention,and at this time,the necessity of the inclusion of environmental rights in the constitution should be considered in a calm manner.Firstly,the nature of the right and the subject of the right of environmental rights are not clear;secondly,the environmental rights are in conflict with the existing constitutional fundamental rights system and their justiciability is also controversial;thirdly,the constitutionalisation of the environmental rights may adversely affect the constitution,resulting in the generalisation of the constitutional rights and weakening of the authority of the constitution;finally,the constitutionalisation of environmental rights is not the best way to achieve environmental governance;a“national goal”model of environmental governance,led by the Constitution and further refined by sectoral laws,would be more effective.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49