检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄润鑫 Runxin Huang(Law School,East China University of Science and Technology,Shanghai)
机构地区:[1]华东理工大学法学院,上海
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2024年第4期2341-2347,共7页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:本文以法院案例研究为基础,探讨了在预先医疗决定范畴下患者自主权与医师自由裁量权之间的关系与解决权利冲突的价值指引和路径构想。解决冲突的价值指引包括立法原则需优先保护高位权利、明确权利边界、重视患者利益至上、规范权利行使;路径强调医疗决策应真实反映患者意愿、明确患者自主权与家属替代决定的边界。法院在调解冲突中扮演重要角色,需要多方合作解决。以期此文对医患关系进行更为全面和深入的法律分析,更好地适应我国老龄化社会需求,促进医疗服务的公平、公正和高效。Based on court case studies,this article discusses the relationship between patient autonomy and physician discretion in the context of advance medical decision-making,and the value guidelines and paths for resolving the conflict of rights.The value guidelines for resolving the conflict include legislative principles that prioritize the protection of superior rights,clarify the boundaries of rights,emphasize the supremacy of patients’interests,and regulate the exercise of rights;and the pathway emphasizes that medical decision-making should truly reflect the patient’s wishes,and clearly define the boundaries between patient autonomy and family members’substitute decision-making.Courts play an important role in mediating conflicts,and need to cooperate with multiple parties to resolve them.We hope that this article will provide a more comprehensive and in-depth legal analysis of the doctor-patient relationship,better adapt to the needs of China’s aging society,and promote the fairness,justice and efficiency of medical services.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49