检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:康华 Hua Kang(College of Humanities and Law,North China University of Science and Technology,Tangshan Hebei)
机构地区:[1]华北理工大学人文法律学院,河北唐山
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2024年第4期2382-2387,共6页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:在经济全球化背景下,社会经济快速发展的新时代,商事交易无处不在,致使商事纠纷比以往更加频繁。在现代法治国家,诉讼制度作为一种公共救济手段,虽然是最常见的纠纷解决机制,但是基于案件分流的实际需要和仲裁制度本身具有的速度、效率等优势,承认并支持仲裁协议效力扩张的做法逐渐为各国所接受。从支持仲裁的角度来看,将合同相对性原则的例外作为支持仲裁协议效力扩张的理论基础是必要的。随着交易的深入发展,必然会出现更多的仲裁协议效力的扩张情形,需要充分考虑和权衡具体案件的情况,在维护仲裁协议效力和仲裁第三人利益之间寻求最佳平衡点。Under the background of economic globalization,in the new era of rapid social and economic development,commercial transactions are everywhere,resulting in commercial disputes more frequent than before.In modern countries ruled by law,litigation system,as a means of public relief,is the most common dispute resolution mechanism,but based on the actual needs of case diver-sion and the advantages of arbitration system itself such as speed and efficiency,the practice of recognizing and supporting the expansion of the effectiveness of arbitration agreements has gradually accepted by all countries.From the perspective of supporting arbitration,it is necessary to take the exception of the principle of contract relativity as the theoretical basis to support the expansion of the validity of arbitration agreements.With the further development of transactions,there will inevitably be more cases of expansion of the effectiveness of arbitration agreements.It is necessary to fully consider and weigh the circumstances of specific cases,and seek the best balance between maintaining the effectiveness of arbitration agreements and the interests of third parties.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49