大数据取之有道:被遗忘权本土化的批判性思考  

Big Data Takes the Right to Justice:Critical Thinking on the Localization of the Right to Be Forgotten

作　　者：吴越[1] Yue Wu(Law School of Jiangxi University of Science and Technology,Ganzhou Jiangxi)

机构地区：[1]江西理工大学法学院,江西赣州

出　　处：《法学（汉斯）》2024年第4期2588-2594,共7页Open Journal of Legal Science

摘　　要：为应对互联网过度记忆对人格权益造成的减损,被遗忘权制度应运而生。尽管被遗忘权已经通过一般数据保护条例(GDPR)正式确立下来,并被引入世界多个国家与地区,但是否应当将被遗忘权纳入立法考量仍然存在理论争议。一方面,对被遗忘权是否有超出现有信息保护制度范围的权利内容(如隐私权、删除权)存在争论。另一方面,学界充斥着对被遗忘权实施后会引发公私利益冲突的担忧。通过对被遗忘权的理论争议抽丝剥茧,锚定被遗忘权的权利内涵,思考被遗忘权的入法价值,可以将被遗忘权界定为一项具有独立权利内涵的新型权利,以更为审慎的态度看待被遗忘权本土化的问题。In order to cope with the impairment of personality rights and interests caused by excessive memory on the Internet,the system of the right to be forgotten came into being.Although the right to be forgotten has been formalized through the General Data Protection Regulation(GDPR)and introduced in many countries around the world,there is still theoretical debate as to whether the right to be forgotten should be taken into account in legislation.On the one hand,there is a debate as to whether the right to be forgotten has rights(e.g.,right to privacy,right to erasure)that go beyond the scope of the existing data protection regime.On the other hand,there are concerns in the academic community that the implementation of the right to be forgotten will lead to conflicts of public and private interests.By peeling back the theoretical controversy over the right to be forgotten,anchoring the connotation of the right to be forgotten,and thinking about the legal value of the right to be forgotten,we can define the right to be forgotten as a new type of right with the connotation of an independent right,and look at the issue of localization of the right of forgetting with a more cautious attitude.

关 键 词：被遗忘权 隐私权 删除权 信息自决 价值选择 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]