检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈昭颖 Zhaoying Chen(School of Law,Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics,Nanchang Jiangxi)
机构地区:[1]江西财经大学法学院,江西南昌
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2024年第4期2672-2680,共9页Open Journal of Legal Science
基 金:江西财经大学大学生创新创业训练计划项目资助。
摘 要:云计算凭借其瞬间就能处理海量信息且能实现降低建设与使用计算资源成本的能力,具有巨大的市场潜力。但在云计算蓬勃发展的背后,却存在着数据独家授权的隐患。在云服务中,用户需要授予云服务商数据访问权才能成功运行程序,然而云服务商为了巩固自己在云市场中的竞争地位,往往通过多种方式限定用户只选择本平台作为云服务供应商,间接导致了数据被独家授权。若不对此现象加以规制,后果将不堪设想。此外,由于立法对限定交易采取的是行为主义,故本文从有关学说、判例中提炼出有关限定交易行为本身的构成要件,划定限定交易行为的边界,并根据限定交易的构成要件检验云市场中存在的数据独家授权行为,初步判定其归属于反垄断法中所规制的限定交易行为。Cloud computing has enormous market potential due to its ability to handle massive amounts of information instantly and reduce the costs of building and using computing resources. However, behind the booming development of cloud computing lies the hidden danger of data exclusive authorization. In cloud services, users need to grant data access rights to cloud service providers in order to successfully run programs. However, in order to solidify their competitive position in thecloud market, cloud service providers often restrict users in various ways to only choose their platform as the cloud service provider, indirectly leading to data being exclusively authorized. Ifthis phenomenon is not regulated, the consequences will be unimaginable. In addition, since legislation takes a behavioral approach to restrictive practices, this article extracts the constitutiveelements of restrictive practices from relevant theories and precedents, delineates the boundaries of restrictive practices, and examines the data exclusive authorization practices in the cloud market based on the constitutive elements of restrictive practices, preliminarily determining their classification as restrictive practices regulated by antitrust laws.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49