检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙忠华[1] 高平 李娜[1] 徐驰[1] 李相成[1] 贾秀玲[1] Sun Zhonghua;Gao Ping;Li Na;Xu Chi;Li Xiangcheng;Jia Xiuling(The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University,Qingdao 266003,China)
机构地区:[1]青岛大学附属医院,青岛266003
出 处:《中国药事》2024年第6期627-633,共7页Chinese Pharmaceutical Affairs
摘 要:目的:构建集采中选药品管理敏感指标。方法:通过循证初步建立集采中选药品管理敏感指标,再通过德尔菲专家函询法对30名药学人员进行2轮函询,并统计整理函询结果。结果:构建的集采中选药品管理敏感指标包括一级指标3项,二级指标11项和三级指标22项。两轮专家函询有效回收率分别为91%和100%。第二轮权威系数为0.82,总体协调系数0.434,检验具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:本研究构建的集采中选药品管理敏感指标满足专家积极程度、权威程度和一致性标准等各项标准。Objective:To establish sensitive indexes for the centralized procurement of selected drugs management.Methods:Based on the evidence,the sensitivity index of centralized procurement of selected drugs management was preliminarily established,and then 30 pharmaceutical personnel were consulted by Delphi expert correspondence method for 2 rounds of correspondence,and the results were statistically sorted out.Result:The sensitive indexes of the centralized procurement of selected drugs management constructed included 3 first-level indexes,11 second-level indexes and 22 third-level indexes.The eff ective recovery rates of 2 rounds of expert letter inquiries were 91%and 100%.The authoritative coefficients of second rounds were 0.82,and the Kendall’s W was 0.434,which had statistically significant(P<0.01).Conclusion:This study constructs the sensitive indicators for the centralized procurement of selected drugs management,which meets the criteria of expert activeness,authority and consistency standards.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28