检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:洪源[1] 万里 单昱 HONG Yuan;WAN Li;SHAN Yu(School of Economy and Trade,Hunan University,Changsha,Hunan,410006,China;School of Public Economics and Administration,Shanghai University of Finance and Economics,Shanghai,200433,China)
机构地区:[1]湖南大学经济与贸易学院,湖南长沙410006 [2]上海财经大学公共经济与管理学院,上海200433
出 处:《经济管理》2024年第5期190-208,共19页Business and Management Journal ( BMJ )
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目“地方政府隐性债务显性化的可持续性评估与优化路径研究”(22BJY079)。
摘 要:地方政府债务风险问题一直是社会各界的关注焦点,地方政府未来税收收入是影响其债务可持续性的一项关键因素。本文以2015年新《预算法》实施后的地方政府债务管理体制改革为准自然实验,运用强度双重差分法,实证检验了地方政府债务显性化对企业避税行为的影响效应及机制。研究发现:地方政府债务管理体制改革所引致的债务显性化政策冲击能显著抑制企业避税行为。其中,债务显性化的规模效应冲击主要通过提高地方政府税收努力的外部作用机制来增加企业避税成本,而债务显性化的结构效应冲击则主要通过缓解企业融资约束的内部作用机制来减弱企业避税动机。此外,地方政府债务显性化政策冲击对企业避税行为的影响效应基于隐性债务扩张速度、企业现金流水平和产业扶持力度存在异质性分布。本文从地方政府债务显性化的微观效应视角,为规范政府举债融资行为、提升政府税收征管效能以及实现地方政府债务可持续性提供了政策参考。From the perspective of debt sustainability,it is not sufficient to merely assess the risk of local government debt based on the size of the debt itself.Instead,it is crucial to examine whether the economic effects generated by the debt can sustain its operation.Since 2008,local governments in China have incurred substantial debt to supplement government finances,but this has also distorted resource allocation and influenced corporate tax avoidance behaviors.Therefore,understanding the relationship between local government debt and corporate tax avoidance behavior correctly,and reducing the substitution and crowding out effects of local government debt on tax revenue,is of great practical significance for better coordinating high⁃quality development with high⁃level security,and comprehensively improving the level of tax governance and debt sustainability.This paper takes the implementation of the new Budget Law in 2015 as a policy shock to the reform of the local government debt management system and utilizes a Difference⁃in⁃Differences approach to construct indicators measuring the“scale effect”and“structure effect”impacts of the explicit debt policy.Innovatively,it explores the impact and mechanism of local government debt explicitation on corporate tax avoidance behavior from a micro perspective.The paper further clarifies the relationship between government debt and taxes,enriches the research on the micro⁃effects of local government debt on enterprises,and deepens the understanding of the motives behind corporate tax avoidance.The research finds:First,both the“scale effect”and“structure effect”impacts of the explicit local government debt policy have a significant negative effect on corporate tax avoidance behavior,indicating that as the size of explicit debt included in the government budget increases and the control over implicit debt gradually tightens,the explicitation of local government debt can significantly suppress corporate tax evasion behaviors.Second,in terms of the mech
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49