国外社会科学前沿:理性理论与行为科学研究之争  

Rational Choice versus Behavioralism:Driving Forces for Social Science Research

作　　者：武建龙 胡晓波 WU Jianlong;HU Xiaobo

机构地区：[1]哈尔滨理工大学经济与管理学院,150006 [2]美国杜克大学 [3]美国克莱姆森大学

出　　处：《国外社会科学前沿》2024年第5期3-16,F0002,共15页JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL SCIENCES

摘　　要：国外社会科学前沿发展中的理性研究与感性研究之争由来已久。就这一问题,通过实例并以《可预测的非理性》一书为经典,在探讨感性行为研究的贡献及其对理性选择理论挑战以及指出理性理论对行为主义挑战而进行批判性发展的基础上,本文详细分析了包括《可预测的非理性》在内的许多行为主义研究实际上是建立在理性假定及其预测性之上的。研究表明,理性理论和行为主义之间的关系是互补性而非替代性。总之,学者们应对理性学派和行为学派均有深刻把握和批评,从而走在社会科学研究的前沿。In review of the debate between the rational choice school and behavioralism,this article examines the latter’s challenges to the former as well as its own contributions to social science research through an in-depth analysis of a contemporary behavioralist classic,Predictably Irrational.It also explores the critical development of choice-theoretic research partly in response to the behavioral challenges.The article argues that much of behavioral research,including Predictably Irrational,has in effect based its predictability on the very assumption of human rationality.The rational choice school and behavioralism can beneft from each other’s research fndings,and scholars could beneft from a better understanding of both schools for their own research.

关 键 词：理性学派 行为主义 广义理性假定 可预测的非理性 选择偏好序列 

分 类 号：C1[社会学]