检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:印波 张笑宇 YIN Bo;ZHANG Xiaoyu(School of Criminal Justice,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,Beijing,China)
出 处:《廉政文化研究》2024年第2期47-64,F0002,共19页Anti-corruption and Integrity Culture Studies
摘 要:文化反腐是新时期腐败犯罪治理的必然选择。腐败文化因素的生成机制与作用机理是多层面、多维度的,公共部门、私营部门与社会领域的腐败文化因素相互交织、相互影响,共同作用于社会主体的腐败感知度,并形成个体的腐败。腐败个体在社会互动中结成腐败同盟,强化腐败文化因素。我国以鲜明的不规则规制特征进行腐败文化因素治理,导致公共部门、私营部门与社会领域腐败文化因素治理机制的失衡。因此,应当以平等化治理为导向,差异化规范不同部门、不同领域之间的关系行为,通过全生态治理实现对腐败文化因素的控制。Cultural anti-corruption is an inevitable choice for the governance of corruption crimes in the new era.The formation mechanism and effect mechanism of corrupt cultural factors are multi-dimensional and multi-level.The corrupt cultural factors in the public sector,private sector,and social field are intertwined and influence each other,jointly affecting the corruption percep-tion of social entities and facilitating individual corruption.Corrupt individuals form corrupt alliances in social interactions,rein-forcing corrupt cultural factors.China has distinctive governance characteristics of corrupt cultural factors regulated by distinct ir-regular regulations,leading to the imbalance of governance mechanisms for corrupt cultural factors in the public sector,private sector,and social fields.Therefore,governance should be guided by equalized measures,differentiating and regulating the relation-ship between different departments and fields,and achieving the control of corrupt cultural factors through holistic governance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.216.230.65