基于人体工效学对一次性医用防护服的评价研究  

Evaluation of Disposable Medical Protective Clothing Based on Ergonomics

作　　者：杨洋[1,2] 杨莉[1,2] 戴旭东 张艺洋[1,2] 张欣 YANG Yang;YANG Yi;DAI Xudong;ZHANG Yiyang;ZHANG Xin(College of Art&Design,Beijing Institute of Graphic Communication,Beijing 102600,China;Laboratory of Human Factors and Interaction,Beijing Institute of Graphic Communication,Beijing 102600,China)

机构地区：[1]北京印刷学院设计艺术学院,北京102600 [2]北京印刷学院人因与交互研究室,北京102600

出　　处：《北京服装学院学报（自然科学版）》2024年第2期62-69,共8页Journal of Beijing Institute of Fashion Technology：Natural Science Edition

基　　金：教育部协同育人项目(220504575303400);北京印刷学院教改创新重点项目(22150222026);北京印刷学院校级教改创新重点项目(22150223062)。

摘　　要：从人体工效学角度对防护服进行测试是防护服性能评价的重要内容。针对目前市场中通用的连脚式、非连脚式一次性医用防护服,募集了30名志愿者作为受试者,分别穿着这2类防护服进行包括关节活动范围、操作灵活性和主观评价等主客观测评。结果表明,穿着2类防护服均对人体踝关节屈伸、内收-外展的活动范围产生了限制影响,踝关节内外旋角度被增大,膝关节外展角度亦明显增大;穿着连脚式防护服对人体四肢活动的自由度产生了限制影响,穿着非连脚式防护服则对人体躯干屈伸动作产生了较大限制影响。Ergonomic testing is an important part of the performance evaluation of protective clothing.To evaluate the commonly used disposable medical protective clothing with/without foot coverings in the market,30 volunteers were recruited as subjects to wear both types of protective clothing for subjective and objective evaluations,including range of motion,flexibility,and subjective evaluations of joint movements.The results showed that both types of protective clothing restricted the flexion-extension and adduction-abduction range of the ankle joint,increased the internal-external rotation angle of the ankle joint,and significantly increased the abduction angle of the knee joint.Wearing disposable protective clothing with foot coverings limited the freedom of limb movement,while wearing clothing without foot coverings significantly affected trunk movements such as flexion and extension.

关 键 词：一次性医用防护服 工效学 关节活动度 

分 类 号：TS941.73[轻工技术与工程—服装设计与工程]