城郊融合类村庄的发展逻辑与治理新命题  

The Development Logic and New Proposition of Governance of Suburban Integrated Villages

作　　者：吴越菲[1] WU Yue-fei(China Modern Urban Research Center and School of Social Development,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200241)

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学中国现代城市研究中心暨社会发展学院,上海200241

出　　处：《中央民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2024年第3期75-85,共11页Journal of Minzu University of China(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“新形势下我国社会发展面临的不确定性及其应对机制研究”(项目编号:22&ZD183);2023年度国家社会科学基金项目“新时期基层社会利益治理的抗解性及其实践应对研究”(项目编号:23BSH080);2022年度上海市哲学社会科学规划项目“新内生发展视角下大都市郊区的‘后乡村性’及其治理模式研究”(项目编号:2022BSH013)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：城郊融合类村庄是乡村更新和乡村振兴的重点领域,也是突破城乡融合发展问题的先行地带。乡村研究常常携带一个假设,即认为乡村发展的弱势主要来自城乡之间的融合程度不足。然而,城乡融合发展实现的内在逻辑为何,城郊融合型村庄又面临哪些发展的未预期后果和风险,对于以上问题的回答仍然存在诸多“知识黑箱”。在后乡土中国的现实背景下,亟须一种与之相呼应的“后乡村性”视角,更好地认识中国农业农村现代化进程中不断呈现出的开放性、差异性和能动性。基于对上海城郊乡村的经验考察,研究发现城郊融合型村庄出现了发展分离的未预期后果,亟待回应社会交易促进、区域社会资本重建、社区治理密度提升等乡村治理新命题。Suburban integrated villages are the key areas of rural renewal and rural revitalization,and also the area to take first attempts in breaking through the problem of urban-rural integration development.However,there are still many knowledge black boxes for the internal logic of urban-rural integrated development,the unexpected consequences and risks of development.In the realistic background of post-rural China,it is urgent to have a"post-rural"perspective to better correspond to the current situation,so as to better understand the openness,difference and initiative constantly presented in the process of China's agricultural and rural modernization.Based on the experience investigation of the suburban villages in Shanghai,the research found the unexpected consequences of the suburban integrated village development separation,and it is urgent to respond to the new propositions of rural governance such as the promotion of social transactions,regional social capital reconstruction,and the improvement of community governance density.

关 键 词：城郊融合类村庄 发展逻辑 乡村治理 后乡村性 

分 类 号：C913.2[经济管理] F323[社会学]