国外数字保存联盟的风险与管控对策分析  

Analysis of Risk and Its Control Strategies of Foreign Digital Preservation Alliances

作　　者：司莉[1] 司涵晖 孔贝贝[2] 周璟 胡吉颖 Si Li;Si Hanhui;Kong Beibei;Zhou Jing;Hu Jiying(School of Information Management,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072;National Science Library,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学信息管理学院,武汉430072 [2]中国科学院文献情报中心,北京100190

出　　处：《图书情报工作》2024年第10期15-23,共9页Library and Information Service

基　　金：中国科学院文献情报中心2022年专项任务“国家科技图书文献中心国家数字科技文献资源长期保存体系建设”(编号:2022XM01)研究成果之一。

摘　　要：[目的/意义]数字保存联盟是实施数字资源长期保存的有效形式,但也存在多种风险,识别和控制各类风险是保证数字保存安全的有效途径,对联盟长期发展具有重要意义。[方法/过程]基于现有数字保存风险评估的有关文件,将数字保存联盟面临的风险因素划分为技术风险、组织风险、版权风险三大类,细分为10项风险因素和30项具体表现形式,进而对43个国外数字保存联盟运行中的真实风险事件及相应的风险管控措施进行调研和分析。[结果/结论]调研结果显示,数字保存联盟在系统维护、机构协调、资源版权方面的风险较为突出,联盟已采取一定管控措施,对我国实施数字保存联盟风险管控具有借鉴意义,建议我国数字保存合作体系构建安全的技术环境,设计可持续的组织管理方案,建立版权保护和资源共享的平衡机制。[Purpose/Significance]The digital preservation alliance,as an effective form of long-term preservation of digital resources,faces various risks.Identifying and controlling the risks are significant for sustainable development of the alliance.[Method/Process]Based on relevant documents on digital preservation risk assessment,this research divided the risks into three categories,namely,technical risk,organizational risk,and copyright risk,and subdivided them into 10 risk factors and 30 specific manifestations.Then it investigated and analyzed the real risk events and the corresponding control strategies in the operation of 43 foreign digital preservation alliances.[Result/Conclusion]The research finds that risks are relatively prominent in system maintenance,institutional coordination and resource copyright.The alliances take certain control strategies,which have great reference for Chinese preservation community.This article suggests that it is necessary for the alliance in China to build a safe technical environment,design a sustainable organizational management plan,and establish a mechanism to balance copyright protection and resource sharing.

关 键 词：数字保存 数字保存联盟 风险分析 

分 类 号：G250.76[文化科学—图书馆学]