福山“历史终结论”建构逻辑批判  

Fukuyama's logical criticism of the construction of"the end of history"

作　　者：肖迎春 XIAO Ying-chun(ChaoHu University,Anhui 238024 China)

机构地区：[1]巢湖学院马克思主义学院,安徽合肥238024

出　　处：《新余学院学报》2024年第3期23-30,共8页Journal of Xinyu University

基　　金：2022年国家社会科学基金项目“历史唯物主义视域下的‘历史终结论’批判研究”(22BKS017)。

摘　　要：福山的“历史终结论”将自由民主制视为人类政治制度的最后形式。福山将承认意识视为人性的核心内容,主张普遍承认是历史的发展方向。然而,这种人性观与历史观完全脱离生活实践,不具有任何现实性。他认为自由民主制实现了承认的普遍化,构成“历史的终结”,但在界定“历史的终结”及“自由民主制”的概念时,混淆了自由民主理念与自由民主模式的区别。他将西方民主模式视为社会发展的普遍模式,且以此评判其他国家的基本政治制度。福山无视政治制度形成的特殊性和历史性,将政治发展视为西方式民主的推广,“历史终结论”不过是以普遍模式呈现的“西方中心论”。Fukuyama's"the end of history"regards liberal democracy as the final form of human political system.Fukuyama regards the recognition of consciousness as the core content of human nature and advocates universal recognition as the direction of historical development.However,this view of human nature is divorced from life practice and does not have any reality.He believes that liberal democracy achieves the universalization of recognition and constitutes the"end of history",but when defining the concepts of"end of history"and"liberal democracy",he confuses the difference between the concept of liberal democracy and the model of liberal democracy.He regards the western democratic model as a universal model of social development and uses it to evaluate the basic political systems of other countries.Fukuyama ignored the particularity and history of the formation of the political system,and regarded the political development as the promotion of western-style democracy,and the"end of history theory"is simply a"western centric theory"presented in a universal pattern.

关 键 词：“历史终结论” 福山 承认 西方式民主 西方中心主义 

分 类 号：B15[哲学宗教—世界哲学] D509[政治法律—政治学]