芳香推拿治疗慢性疲劳综合征34例随机对照临床研究  

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Treated with Massage Combined with Aromatic Therapy in 34 Cases:A Randomized Controlled Study

作　　者：吴双韵 付勇[2] 刘慧[2] 章甜 李琳慧 章海凤[2] WU Shuangyun;FU Yong;LIU Hui;ZHANG Tian;LI Linhui;ZHANG Haifeng(Jiangxi Uniwersity of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Nanchang,330004;The Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine)

机构地区：[1]江西中医药大学,江西省南昌市330004 [2]江西中医药大学附属医院

出　　处：《中医杂志》2024年第12期1249-1254,共6页Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine

基　　金：江西省中医药管理局重点研究室(第二批)建设项目(KP202102001);江西省中医药管理局科技计划项目(2021A396);国家中医药管理局中医康复中心建设单位项目(国中医药医政函[2023]255号)。

摘　　要：目的探讨并比较芳香推拿疗法与传统推拿疗法治疗慢性疲劳综合征的临床疗效。方法将72例慢性疲劳综合征患者随机分为芳香推拿组和传统推拿组,每组36例。两组均采用精油香薰并同时采用精油于头面部及腹部进行推拿操作,芳香推拿组所用精油为改善疲劳精油,传统推拿组所用精油为安慰剂精油。两组患者均每次治疗30 min,隔日1次,每周3次,共治疗4周。比较两组治疗前后疲劳量表(FS-14)、中医证候积分量表及治疗后患者满意度评价量表评分,观察患者疲劳和其他临床症状的改善及中医证候积分的变化并评定两组临床疗效。结果传统推拿组脱落3例,33例完成观察;芳香推拿组脱落2例,34例完成观察。与治疗前比较,两组患者治疗后FS-14评分和中医证候积分均明显降低(P<0.01);治疗后与传统推拿组FS-14评分[(4.42±2.44)分]和中医证候积分[(34.12±7.67)分]比较,芳香推拿组患者FS-14评分[(3.06±2.37)分]和中医证候积分[(28.79±5.62)分]更低(P<0.05或P<0.01)。治疗后两组患者满意度评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),芳香推拿组总有效率(94.12%,32/34)高于传统推拿组(84.85%,28/33)(P<0.05)。结论芳香推拿治疗与传统推拿治疗皆能改善慢性疲劳综合征患者疲劳等临床症状,而芳香推拿疗法较传统推拿疗法疗效更优,且操作简易,患者接受度高。Obejective To investigate and compare the clinical efficacy of aroma massage with traditional massage in the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome(CFS).Methods Seventy-two CFS patients were randomized into the aroma massage group and the traditional massage group,with 36 patients in each group.Both groups were treated with essential oil aromatherapy and massage were performed on the head,face,and abdomen stimultaneously.The aroma massage group used antifatigue oil,while the traditional massage group used placebo essential oil.The two groups were treated for 30 minutes each time,once every other day,three times a week,for a total of 4 weeks.The fatigue scale(FS-14)score,traditional Chinese medicine(TCM)syndrome score and patient satisfaction evaluation scale score before and after the treatment of the two groups were assessed to study the improvement of fatigue and other clinical symptoms of the patients as well as the changes of the TCM symptom scores,and to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the two groups.Results With three drop-outs in the traditional massage group and two drop-outs in the aroma massage group,33 cases in the traditional massage group and 34 cases in the aroma massage group were included in the outcome analysis.The FS-14 scores and TCM syndrome scores significantly decreased after treatment in both groups(P<0.01);compared to those in the traditional massage group(FS-14:4.42±2.44;TCM syndrome score:34.12±7.67),the FS-14 score(3.06±2.37)and TCM syndrome score(28.79±5.62)in the aroma massage group were significantly lower(P<0.05 or P<0.01).There was no significant difference in the satisfaction scores of the patients in the two groups after the treatment(P>0.05).The total effective rate of the aroma massage group was 94.12%(32/34),which was significantly higher than 84.85%(28/33)of the traditional massage group(P<0.05).Conclusion Both aromatherapy and traditional massage can improve the clinical symptoms of fatigue in CFS patients,and aromatherapy is more effective,which is easy to operate with

关 键 词：慢性疲劳综合征 芳香疗法 推拿 随机对照研究 

分 类 号：R259[医药卫生—中西医结合]