纤维带与无头加压螺钉治疗第1,2跖骨近端粉碎性骨折Lisfranc损伤  

Suture tape and headless compression screws in treatment of Lisfranc injury with comminuted fractures of the first and second proximal metatarsal bones

作　　者：黄浩波 梁馨元 叶国忠 谢庆祥 苏博源[1] Huang Haobo;Liang Xinyuan;Ye Guozhong;Xie Qingxiang;Su Boyuan(Dongguan Hospital(Dongguan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine),Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine,Dongguan 523000,Guangdong Province,China)

机构地区：[1]广州中医药大学东莞医院(东莞市中医院),广东省东莞市523000

出　　处：《中国组织工程研究》2025年第9期1803-1809,共7页Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research

基　　金：东莞市社会发展科技项目(20211800900062),项目负责人:苏博源;广东省医学科研基金项目(A2023480),项目参与人:谢庆祥,梁馨元。

摘　　要：背景:Lisfranc韧带是维持足部横弓与纵弓的重要结构,Lisfranc损伤为一种严重的中足损伤。Lisfranc韧带损伤是复杂的,其治疗以及首选的固定方法有争议。目的:比较钢板联合Suturetape与钢板联合无头加压螺钉治疗第1,2跖骨近端粉碎性骨折Lisfranc损伤的短期疗效。方法:回顾性分析东莞市中医院骨七科2019年1月至2022年6月因第1,2跖骨近端粉碎性骨折Lisfranc损伤患者48例,其中25例采用钢板联合Suture tape固定(观察组),23例采用钢板联合无头加压螺钉固定(对照组)。术前参照影像学资料,根据Myerson分类系统进行分型;术后随访根据骨折愈合时间、目测类比评分、美国足踝外科学会标准评估足功能恢复情况,并对两组术后并发症进行比较分析。结果与结论:①两组患者均顺利完成手术并获得随访,随访时间12-36个月,平均(18.0±5.42)个月;②两组患者手术时间、术中出血量比较差异均无显著性意义(P>0.05);③观察组较对照组骨折愈合时间稍长,差异有显著性意义(P<0.05);④术后3,6,12个月随访,观察组较对照组目测类比评分明显降低(P<0.05);⑤术后6,12个月,观察组术后各时间点随访足功能AOFAS评分较螺钉组明显改善(P<0.05),且均较术前显著提高(P<0.05);⑥术后观察组出现1例创伤性关节炎,对照组出现1例切口感染、1例螺钉断裂及2例创伤性关节炎,两组比较差异无显著性意义(P>0.05),考虑与样本量偏少有关;⑦提示对于第1,2跖骨近端粉碎性骨折Lisfranc损伤,实施钢板联合Suture tape内固定治疗Lisfranc关节损伤效果可靠,可改善患者足关节功能,且具有手术创伤小、术后并发症少、远期医源性创伤性关节炎风险低的优势,较无头加压钉更有利于足功能的恢复。BACKGROUND:Lisfranc ligament is an important structure to maintain the transverse and longitudinal arch of the foot.This injury is a serious injury.Lisfranc ligamentous injuries are complex,and their treatment,along with the preferred method of fixation,is controversial.OBJECTIVE:To compare the short-term efficacy of plate combined with Suture tape versus plate combined with headless compression screw in the treatment of Lisfranc injury with comminuted fractures of the 1st and 2nd proximal metatarsal bones.METHODS:A retrospective analysis was performed on 48 patients with Lisfranc injury due to comminuted fractures of the 1st and 2nd proximal metatarsal bones in Seventh Department of Orthopedics,Dongguan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2019 to June 2022.Among them,25 were fixed with plate combined with Suture tape(observation group)and 23 were fixed with plate combined with headless compression screw(control group).Preoperative classification was performed according to Myerson classification system based on preoperative imaging data.Postoperative follow-up was performed according to fracture healing time,visual analog scale,and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society(AOFAS)criteria to assess the recovery of foot functions.Postoperative complications were compared and analyzed between the two groups.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:(1)All cases completed the operation successfully and obtained follow-up in the two groups.The postoperative follow-up time of the two groups was 12-36 months,with a mean of(18.0±5.42)months.(2)There were no significant differences in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups(P>0.05).(3)The fracture healing time of observation group was slightly longer than that of control group(P<0.05).(4)After 3,6,and 12 months of follow-up,the visual analog scale score of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group(P<0.05).(5)At 6 and 12 months after operation,AOFAS score of foot function in the observation group was signific

关 键 词：第1 2跖骨近端粉碎性骨折 LISFRANC损伤 钢板 无头加压螺钉 Suturetape 内固定 

分 类 号：R459.9[医药卫生—治疗学] R318[医药卫生—临床医学] R687