后路C_(2-3)固定结合顶棒置入与单纯后路C_(2-3)固定治疗不稳定Hangman骨折的比较  

Comparison of posterior C_(2-3) fixation combined with bucking bar technique and posterior C_(2-3) fixation alone in treatment of unstable Hangman fractures

作　　者：张浩 王清 张建 李广州 王高举 Zhang Hao;Wang Qing;Zhang Jian;Li Guangzhou;Wang Gaoju(Department of Orthopedics,Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University,Luzhou 646000,Sichuan Province,China)

机构地区：[1]西南医科大学附属医院骨科,四川省泸州市646000

出　　处：《中国组织工程研究》2025年第9期1848-1854,共7页Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research

基　　金：泸州市人民政府--西南医科大学科技战略合作项目(2020LZXNYDJ40),项目负责人:王高举。

摘　　要：背景:Hangman骨折中Ⅱ、ⅡA、Ⅲ型常需手术治疗,手术方式选择存在较大争议,目前均存在术后复位不全及畸形愈合等不足;前期作者团队使用C_(2-3)拉力螺钉结合经口顶棒技术间歇性推顶C2椎体治疗不稳定Hangman骨折,取得了满意的临床疗效,但前期研究样本少,且缺少对照组比较。目的:比较后路C_(2-3)固定结合经口顶棒技术和单纯后路C_(2-3)固定治疗不稳定Hangman骨折的临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析西南医科大学附属医院收治的行后路C_(2-3)固定手术治疗的55例不稳定Hangman骨折患者临床及影像学资料,根据手术方案分为2组,其中23例患者接受后路C_(2-3)固定结合经口顶棒技术治疗(A组),32例接受单纯后路C_(2-3)固定术(B组)。比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、并发症、术前及末次随访时疼痛目测类比评分、颈椎功能障碍指数、美国脊髓损伤协会脊髓损伤分级和患者满意度(Odom’s分级);另外对比各观察时间点C_(2-3)移位和成角及其他影像学指标的变化。结果与结论:①两组患者手术时间、术中出血量和术后并发症发生情况比较差异无显著性意义(P>0.05);②两组患者末次随访颈痛目测类比评分和颈椎功能障碍指数较术前获得显著改善(P<0.05),Odom’s分级显示A组优良21例(91%);B组优良29例(91%);两组各项临床疗效指标比较差异均无显著性意义(均P>0.05);③两组术前C_(2-3)成角和位移差异无显著性意义(P>0.05);术后及末次随访时,两组患者C_(2-3)成角和位移均较术前明显减小,差异有显著性意义(P<0.01);术后和末次随访上述指标比较差异无显著性意义(P>0.05);术后及末次随访时,A组C_(2-3)位移和成角较B组明显减小,差异有显著性意义(P<0.05);④末次随访时,A组患者均未发生残余畸形,B组发生残余畸形4例(13%,4/32);⑤因此,后路C_(2-3)固定结合经口顶棒技术可能有利于枢椎体复位和稳定,减少畸�BACKGROUND:Types II,IIA,and III of Hangman fractures often require surgical treatment,and the selection of surgical methods is controversial.Current surgeries have shortcomings such as incomplete reduction and malunion after surgery.In the early stage,our team used C2-3 lag screws combined with a bucking bar.Intermittent pushing of the C2 vertebral body in the oropharynx has achieved satisfactory clinical results.However,the preliminary studies included few samples and lacked a control group for comparison.OBJECTIVE:To compare the clinical efficacy of posterior C2-3 fixation combined with the bucking bar technique and posterior C2-3 fixation alone in the treatment of unstable Hangman fractures.METHODS:The clinical and imaging data of 55 patients with unstable Hangman fractures who underwent posterior C2-3 internal fixation in Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University were retrospectively analyzed.According to the surgical plan,the patients were divided into two groups.Among them,23 patients received posterior cervical C2-3 internal fixation combined with the bucking bar technique(group A),and 32 patients received simple posterior C2-3 internal fixation(group B).Operation time,intraoperative blood loss,complications,pain visual analog scale score,neck disability index,American Spinal Injury Association classification,and patient satisfaction(Odom’s classification)preoperation and during follow-up were compared between the two groups.The changes in C2-3 displacement and angulation and other imaging indicators were compared at each observation time point.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:(1)There was no statistically significant difference in operation time,intraoperative blood loss,and postoperative complications between the two groups(P>0.05).(2)The neck pain visual analog scale and neck disability index scores of the two groups of patients at the final follow-up were significantly improved compared with those before surgery(P<0.05).The Odom standard classification showed that 21 cases(91%)in group A were excelle

关 键 词：HANGMAN骨折 顶棒技术 后路拉力螺钉 骨折复位 内固定 

分 类 号：R459.9[医药卫生—治疗学] R318[医药卫生—临床医学] R681