检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张一超 Yichao Zhang(School of Law,Xinjiang University of Finance and Economics,Urumqi Xinjiang)
机构地区:[1]新疆财经大学法学院,新疆乌鲁木齐
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2024年第5期2766-2772,共7页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:该案例来自财政部发布的指导性案例第30号,主要涉及《政府采购法》在进口机电产品的政府采购活动的法律适用问题以及中标候选人是否具有作为原告提起行政诉讼的资格这两个问题。本文基于案情,结合相关法律法规进行分析,认为对于本案例中的机电产品的采购活动应该适用《政府采购法》,中标候选人不具有对于此次财政部的行政行为提起行政诉讼的原告资格。This case is from Guiding Case No.30 issued by the Ministry of Finance,and mainly involves the application of the Government Procurement Law to government procurement activities involving the import of mechanical and electrical products,and whether the winning candidate has the Standing to file an administrative lawsuit as a plaintiff.Based on the facts of the case and the analysis of relevant laws and regulations,this paper argues that the Government Procurement Law should be applied to the procurement of mechanical and electrical products in this case,and the winning candidate does not have the standing to file an administrative lawsuit against the admin istrative act of the Ministry of Finance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145