检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梁莹杉 Yingshan Liang(College of Humanities and Social Development,Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University,Xianyang Shaanxi)
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2024年第5期3305-3312,共8页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:技术鉴定是植物新品种权纠纷案件审理中认定侵权的最主要手段。基于305份司法裁判文书的实证分析显示,技术鉴定在类案中的适用情况未达理论上的理想效果。在具体方法选择上,呈现出DNA鉴定为主,DUS鉴定为辅的特征。结合数据分析和司法个案,进一步发现技术鉴定适用中在鉴定方法科学性、鉴定机构权威性、机构布局合理性以及鉴定程序合法性等方面存在一定问题,并提出通过生物化学、信息技术等技术手段和法律手段结合优化鉴定环节、合理布局鉴定机构、完善鉴定与诉讼的衔接机制等完善路径。Technical appraisal is the most important means of determining infringement in cases of disputes over new plant variety rights.The empirical analysis based on 305 judicial documents shows that the application of technical identification in such cases has not reached the theoretically ideal ef-fect.In the selection of specific methods,it presents the characteristics of DNA identification as the main one and DUS identification as the supplementary one.Combined with the data analysis and judicial cases,it is further found that there are certain problems in the application of technical identification in terms of scientific identification methods,authority of identification agencies,ra-tionality of the layout of the agencies and legality of the identification procedures,etc.,and it is proposed to optimize the identification process through the combination of biochemistry,infor-mation technology and other technological and legal means,to rationally lay out the identification agencies,and to perfect the mechanism for the connection of identification and litigation and oth-er paths of improvement.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49