检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑常绿 刘静 俞玥 邓江玉 Changlv Zheng;Jing Liu;Yue Yu;Jiangyu Deng(School of Law and Politics,Shi Liangcai School of Journalism and Communication,Zhejiang Sci-Tech University,Hangzhou Zhejiang)
机构地区:[1]浙江理工大学法政学院、史量才新闻与传播学院,浙江杭州
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2024年第5期3473-3483,共11页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:立足于指导性制度案例走入司法的背景,为解决目前刑事指导性案例参照制度的困境,尝试通过“刑法构成要件要素类型化”来解除我国法官运用指导性案例时对于罪刑法定原则的顾虑,重新认识刑事指导性案例参照制度天然的类比推理属性及其合理性所在,厘清与罪刑法定原则之间的界限,协助我国司法人员再认识类比推理:运用类型化的构成要件要素以识别类案,促进我国刑事指导性案例的准确司法应用。希冀在刑法构成要件要素类型化的作用下,推动刑法各罪名要素更为清晰,刑法体系更加融洽。Based on the background of the guiding system of cases into the judicial system,in order to solve the current dilemma of the criminal guiding case reference system,try to explore the“typology of criminal law constituent elements”to relieve the judges of China’s guiding cases of the principle of the law of crime and punishment,and to re-conceptualise the guiding case reference system.Ana-logical reasoning attributes and its rationality,clarify the boundaries with the principle of the law of punishment and crime,to assist our judicial personnel to re-understand the analogical reason-ing:to grasp the guiding cases and pending cases with the typed constituent elements,so as to identify the analogous cases,and to promote the accurate judicial application of China’s criminal guiding cases.It is hoped that under the effect of typology of criminal law constituent elements,the elements of criminal law will be promoted to be clearer and the criminal law system will be more harmonious.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7