检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈敏 Chen Min(Bozhou District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Zunyi City,Zunyi 563100,Guizhou Province,China)
出 处:《中外医药研究》2024年第13期93-95,共3页JOURNAL OF CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICINE AND PHARMACY RESEARCH
摘 要:目的:比较消痔灵原液与芍倍注射液治疗直肠脱垂的临床效果。方法:选取2020年9月—2022年12月遵义市播州区中医院收治的直肠脱垂患者60例作为研究对象,采用随机表法分为观察组和对照组,各30例。对照组接受芍倍注射液治疗,观察组接受消痔灵原液治疗。比较两组治疗效果、便秘情况、不良反应发生率。结果:观察组治疗总有效率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P=0.044)。治疗前,两组排便困难、便后不尽、排便频率、排便时间、肛门堆积堵塞、肛门检查评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,两组排便困难、便后不尽、排便频率、排便时间、肛门堆积堵塞、肛门检查评分降低,观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组不良情况发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:消痔灵原液在直肠脱垂中的应用效果优于芍倍注射液,可提高治疗效果,缓解便秘情况,且未增加不良反应发生风险。Objective:To compare the clinical effect of Xiaozhiling liquid and Shaobei injection in the treatment of rectal prolapse.Methods:A total of 60 patients with rectal prolapse were selected as the research objects at Bozhou District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Zunyi City from September 2020 to December 2022,and were divided into observation group and control group by random table method,with 30 cases in each group.The control group was treated with Shaobei injection,and the observation group was treated with Xiaozhiling liquid.The treatment effect,constipation and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.Results:The total effective rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P=0.044).Before treatment,there was no significant difference between the two groups in defecation difficulty,incontinence after defecation,defecation frequency,defecation time,anal accumulation and blockage,and anal examination score(P>0.05);after treatment,difficulty in defecation,incontinence after defecation,defecation frequency,defecation time,anal accumulation and blockage,and anal examination score were decreased in both groups,and the observation group was lower than the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse conditions between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:The application effect of Xiaozhiling liquid in the treatment of rectal prolapse is better than that of Shaobei injection,which can improve the treatment effect and relieve constipation without increasing the risk of adverse reactions.
分 类 号:R269[医药卫生—中西医结合]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49