僧肇与郭象动静观和变化观之对比分析  

A Comparison between Sengzhao’s and Guo Xiang’s views of “Motion and Stillness” and Changing

作　　者：田四通 TIAN Si-tong(Institute of Oriental Humanities and Ideology,Huafan University,New Taipei,Taiwan,China)

机构地区：[1]华梵大学东方人文思想研究所,中国台湾新北

出　　处：《宝鸡文理学院学报（社会科学版）》2024年第3期43-49,共7页Journal of Baoji University of Arts and Sciences：Social Science Edition

摘　　要：僧肇是魏晋时期借助老庄玄学语词解释佛教思想的代表人物之一,其论作《物不迁论》中有大量关于“动静”问题的论述。在僧肇之前,许多玄学家也对“动静”问题十分关注。其中,郭象的“变化观”源于其“独化自生论”,并与其“名教即自然”的观点有机地结合在一起,形成了郭象独有的玄学理论。僧肇在讨论“动静”问题时所使用的语言和句式与郭象比较相似,但是对于僧肇而言,“动静”问题本身就是僧肇中观般若学论证过程中的一个切入点和论证手段。通过对僧肇和郭象的动静观与变化观的讨论,能清楚地看到僧肇、郭象二人看待动静问题的不同视角,以及论及动静问题的目的之差别。During Wei Jin Period,discussion of the issue of motion and stillness was included in the “pure talk”(qingtan).When Xuanxue scholars discussed the issue of motion and stillness,they expressed it as an example of the issue of presence and non-presence.Sengzhao was a representative scholar who interpreted Buddhist thoughts,drawing on Daoist-Xuanxue terminology and thoughts.When he discussed the issue of motion and stillness,he took it as a key link in his discussion of the issue of presence and non-presence.The discussion of motion and stillness itself was very important for Seng Zhao to clarify his Buddhist thought based on the middle-way concept.The differences between Sengzhao's and Guo Xiang's views of “motion and stillness” and the different perspectives as well as the purpose and intention of discussing the motion and stillness issue can be seen clearly through the discussion.

关 键 词：僧肇 郭象 动静 变化 

分 类 号：B948[哲学宗教—宗教学]