检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:付姝菊 FU Shuju(Law School,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)
出 处:《华北水利水电大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第5期75-82,共8页Journal of North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power(Social Science Edition)
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大研究专项项目(18VHJ015);中国人大制度理论研究会立项课题(2021052);北京师范大学学术型研究生专项科研基金项目(2022LAW011)。
摘 要:21世纪以来,军事领域应用人工智能技术研发的新型武器如雨后春笋般出现。人工智能武器具有智能性和攻击性,在法律上可被认为是具有一定自主决策能力并辅助人类进行攻击的工具。人工智能武器的出现对国际人道法的区分原则、比例原则和马尔顿斯条款造成了冲击,给国际人道法的归责原则带来了挑战。为保证人工智能武器的合理利用,国际社会应强化事前审查制度,构建事中执行标准,完善事后追责机制,避免人工智能武器带来巨大法律风险和伦理危机,捍卫人类社会的和平、安全和尊严。New weapons developed using artificial intelligence technology in the military field have emerged rapidly.AI weapons are characterized by their intelligence and offensiveness,and can be considered as tools to assist human attacks with a certain degree of autonomous decision-making ability.The emergence of AI weapons has impacted the principles of distinction,proportionality and the Maltens Clause of international humanitarian law,posing challenges to the principle of accountability within this framework.To ensure the rational use of AI weapons,the international community should strengthen the prior review system,establish standards for implementation during the event,improve the mechanism for accountability after the event.These measures aim to achieve peace,security,and dignity in human society,thereby avoiding significant legal risks and ethical crises brought about by AI weapons.
关 键 词:国际人道法 战争法 人工智能武器 《特定常规武器公约》
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.212.53