城市更新项目中地方政府政策执行偏差影响因素的实证分析  

Empirical analysis on influencing factors of local government policy implementation deviation in urban renewal projects

作　　者：孙春玲[1] 孙立晓 SUN Chunling;SUN Lixiao(School of Management,Tianjin University of Technology,Tianjin 300384,China)

机构地区：[1]天津理工大学管理学院,天津300384

出　　处：《天津理工大学学报》2024年第3期1-8,共8页Journal of Tianjin University of Technology

基　　金：教育部人文社科一般项目(19YJA630060)。

摘　　要：识别城市更新项目政策执行背后深层影响机理是提高城市更新政策效果的重要路径。文中基于委托代理理论,结合文献分析提炼出地方政府政策执行影响因素,然后运用模糊集定性比较分析(fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis, fsQCA)方法,构建分析框架,讨论目标模糊(blur goal, BG)、自利倾向(self-interested tendency, ST)、晋升激励(promotion incentive, PI)、资源禀赋(resources endow, RE)、监督与考核(supervision and assessment, SA)、执行压力(execution pressure, EP)这6个条件变量的不同组合,对城市更新项目政策执行偏差(policy implementation deviation, PID)的作用机理。研究发现,所有单一条件变量的一致性均小于0.9,表明这些因素并不构成城市更新项目政策执行偏差的必要条件。通过多变量组态分析,得出城市更新项目政策执行偏差发生的6条路径,并总结为目标漂移型偏差、激励不足型偏差、资源桎梏型偏差模式3种典型模式。其中,监督与考核缺位构成了政策执行偏差的核心条件。Identifying the deep impact mechanism behind the policy implementation of urban renewal projects is an important way to improve the effect of urban renewal policies.This study is based on principal-agent theory,combined with literature analysis,the influencing factors of local government policy implementation are extracted.Then,using the fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis method(fsQCA),this paper constructs an analysis framework to discuss the different combinations of six conditional variables:blur goal(BG),self-interest tendency(ST),promotion incentive(PI),resource endowment(RE),supervision and assessment(SA),and execution pressure(EP),and the mechanism of policy implementation deviation of urban renewal projects.It is found that the consistency of all single conditional variables is less than 0.9,indicating that these factors do not constitute the necessary conditions for the policy implementation deviation of urban renewal projects.Through the multivariate grouping analysis,six paths for the occurrence of policy implementation deviations in urban renewal projects are derived and summarized into three typical patterns,namely,goal-drift-type deviation,incentive-deficiency-type deviation,and resource-shackling-type deviation pattern.Among them,the lack of supervision and assessment is the core condition that constitutes the policy implementation deviation.

关 键 词：城市更新 委托代理理论 政策执行偏差 定性比较分析 

分 类 号：T-01[一般工业技术]